cc-education AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: development of an education license or license option for Creative Commons
List archive
- From: email AT greglondon.com
- To: cc-education AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: [cc-education] WHY EDU ?
- Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 09:25:46 -0800 (PST)
Since a longer message generated no replies,
I'll try a shorter one.
Can someone explain WHY an Education-Only
license needs to exist?
What benefits would an education-only license
have that would compensate for the advantages
LOST from not using a much more public CC-BY-SA.
For reference, the software open source defintion,
http://www.opensource.org/docs/definition.php
item #5 says "no discrimination against persons or groups"
item #6 says "no discrimination against fields of endeavors"
explanations are included immediately afterwards.
For what reasons are the lessons of open source
that were learned in the software world being
ignored by the push to create an eductation-only
license?
-
[cc-education] WHY EDU ?,
email, 02/09/2004
-
Re: [cc-education] WHY EDU ?,
Zachary Chandler, 02/09/2004
- Re: [cc-education] WHY EDU ?, Heather Ford, 02/09/2004
- Re: [cc-education] WHY EDU ?, Wouter Vanden Hove, 02/09/2004
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- RE: [cc-education] WHY EDU ?, Alexander, Bryan, 02/09/2004
-
RE: [cc-education] WHY EDU ?,
email, 02/09/2004
- RE: [cc-education] WHY EDU ?, David Palmer, 02/09/2004
- Re: [cc-education] WHY EDU ?, David Wiley, 02/10/2004
-
RE: [cc-education] WHY EDU ?,
email, 02/09/2004
-
Re: [cc-education] WHY EDU ?,
David Wiley, 02/09/2004
- Re: [cc-education] WHY EDU ?, Stephen Downes, 02/10/2004
-
Re: [cc-education] WHY EDU ?,
David Wiley, 02/09/2004
-
Re: [cc-education] WHY EDU ?,
Zachary Chandler, 02/09/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.