Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

b-hebrew - Re: [b-hebrew] G.Gertoux and the Name...

b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "Rolf" <rolf.furuli AT sf-nett.no>
  • To: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] G.Gertoux and the Name...
  • Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2013 11:09:35 +0200

Dear Bryant,


I appreciate your cordial tone. The members of b-hebrew may disagree in many
things, but we should respect each other and not use negative insinuations.
See my answers below.


Mandag 10. Juni 2013 10:07 CEST skrev "Rev. Bryant J. Williams III"
<bjwvmw AT com-pair.net>:

> Dear Rolf,
>
> Please clarify the following:
>
> [Rolf said]
> The manuscript P. Fouad 266 from the second or first century BCE has YHWH
> in Aramaic script;...
>
> [Bryant]
> For those members who have not had training in reading the manuscripts. Is
> the above manuscript Hebrew with Aramaic Script?

RF: The manuscript is a translation into Greek, and only YHWH is written in
Aramaic script.

>
> [Rolf]
> 8Hev12Gr from the first century BCE or first century CE has YHWH in
> Paleo-Hebrew Script:
>
> [Bryant]
> Is the entire manuscript written in ancient Biblical Hebrew script or just
> the Tetragrammaton?

RF: The correct designation of the manuscript is 8HevXIIgr. The manuscript
is a translation into Greek, and only YHWH is written in Paleo-Hebrew script.
>
> [Rolf]
> 4QLXXLevb from the first century BCE has the phonemic transcription IAO
>
> [Bryant]
> Is LXX manuscript written entirely in Greek? If so, would it be in Uncial
> or minuscule? or is it another language, but the Tetragrammaton is written
> in Greek?

RF: The manuscript is entirely in Greek, and it has IAW in Greek letters.
>
> [Rolf]
> P. Oxy 50.3522 from around 50 CE has YHWH in Paleo-Hebrew script.
>
> [Bryant]
> Is the entire manuscript written ancient Biblical Hebrew script or just the
> Tetragrammaton?

RF: The manuscript is a translation into Greek, and YHWH is in Paleo-Hebrew
script.
>
> My edition of the NIV Triglot Old Testament (edited by John R. Kohlenberger
> III) has three columns: Hebrew (MT- Leningradensis); LXX (4th edition of
> Tischendorf, following the Sixtine tradition of Codex Vaticanus (B), which
> supplied the missing parts of Alexandrinus (A). Swete's and Rahlf's
> editions are virtually identical except the critical apparatus' which vary)
> and, finally, the NIV. In reading the text and also using the Logos Digital
> Library which uses Rahlf's, it is interesting in your remarks regarding the
> lack of KURIOS for YHWH.
>
> The text does use KURIOS for YHWH, but also KURIOS for Adonai. QEOS is used
> for Elohim and cognates. When one looks at the texts then one will see that
> there is some variation, KURIOS = YHWH and Adonai; QEOS = Elohim, El,
> Eloah, etc. The English translations usually use, LORD (YHWH), Lord
> (Adonai), LORD God (YHWH Elohim, etc), and Lord GOD (Adonai YHWH - ). In
> most cases, the problem really is between the Kethib/Qere.
>
> [Rolf]\
> No LXX or LXX-like manuscript from BCE or the first century CE has KURIOS
> as a substitute of YHWH.
>
> [Bryant]
> This does not make any sense and contradicts the evidence.

RF: No, you are wrong. Please look at
http:/ccat.sas.upenn.edu/rak/publics/2008sbl/text/htm. Robert Kraft in an
expert on old manuscripts, and he confirms what I have written above. Note
that Kraft, after he has mentioned the tetragrams and IAO says, "and probably
in Greek translation (KURIOS)." But he does not refer to any evidence,
because there is no such evidence. A discussion of the widespread use of IAO
in the Greek world from the third century BCE to the second century CE, see
the doctoral dissertation of F. E. Shaw "The Earliest Non-mystical Use of
Iao," University of Cincinnati, 2002.
>
> Regarding אֲדֹנָ֨י יְהוִ֜ה (Adonai YHWH )
> 1. Used 327 times in Tanakh;
>
> a.. 217x in Ezekiel alone
> b.. Isaiah as 26x (1-39 has 12x; 40-66 has 14x); Jeremiah 14x.
> c.. Amos 20x.
> d.. Total of 25x in Minor Prophets.
> e.. NOTE: אֲדֹנָ֥י יְהֹוִֽה׃ The MT has this in the vast majority of
> instances in Ezekiel. LXX, in this instance, is translating, אֲדֹנָ֥י, by
> κύριος and leaving, יְהֹוִֽה, untranslated; at least that is what it
> appears to me to be happening. The NIV translates as "Sovereign Lord,"
> while KJV translates it as "Lord GOD." Elsewhere, the vast majority of
> instances also has κύριος translating יְהֹוִֽה. Sometines κύριος and θεός
> together as in Ezek 4:14 in the vocative, etc.
> 2. 3X all in Psalms, יְהוִ֣ה אֲדֹנָ֣י (YHWH Adonai) is used; 1x in Habakkuk
> 3:19.
> 3. 8x in Isaiah (5x in Chapter 22 regarding the Destruction of Jerusalem),
> 6x in Jeremiah, אֲדֹנָ֤י יְהוִה֙ צְבָאֹ֔ות (Adonai YHWH Sebaoth), is used;
> 1x in Isaiah 30:15, אֲדֹנָ֨י יְהוִ֜ה קְדֹ֣ושׁ יִשְׂרָאֵ֗ל (Adonai YHWH
> Qedosh Yisrael), is used.
>
> 4. 93x, נְאֻ֖ם אֲדֹנָ֥י יְהוִֽה (Neum Adonai YHWH), is used with the vast
> majority in Ezekiel (81x ) and Amos (6x).
>
> 5. 5x, אֲנִ֖י אֲדֹנָ֥י יְהוִֽה ('ani Adonai YHWH), is used for emphasis;
> אֲדֹנָ֣י יְהוִה֒ הִנֵּה֩ אֲנִ֨י (Adonai YHWH Hinnel 'ani) (3x), חַי־אָ֗נִי
> נְאֻם֮ אֲדֹנָ֣י יְהוִה֒ (Chit Neum Adonai YHWH) (13X), are also used.
>
> 6. Used 7x by King David in his Prayer to God regarding the Promises made
> to David regarding the Davidic Covenant II Samuel 7:18-29 where the LXX use
> κύριος to translate both יְהוִה֙ and אֲדֹנָ֤י
>
> Rev. Bryant J. Williams III


Best regards,



Rolf Furuli
Stavern
NMorway







Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page