b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
- From: "Bryant J. Williams III" <bjwvmw AT com-pair.net>
- To: "Randall Buth" <randallbuth AT gmail.com>, "Hebrew" <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] no to aspect
- Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2011 13:03:09 -0800
Dear Randall,
Thank you for your response. Rolf's answer to me sounded like he does not
agree
with the definitions given in your review article and Andrason's article. I
think there is a lot more of the both/and equation in Hebrew verb patterns
rather than either/or. I think your article and Andrason's seem to make that
connection.
Rev. Bryant J. Williams III
----- Original Message -----
From: "Randall Buth" <randallbuth AT gmail.com>
To: "Hebrew" <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
Sent: Friday, February 04, 2011 12:02 PM
Subject: [b-hebrew] no to aspect
> >Dear Bryant,
> > No, all the prefix forms are imperfective in all genres, and all the
> > suffix forms are perfective in all genres.
>
> Bryant,
> That expresses a VERY idiosyncratic viewpoint. Some/most would say a non-
> Hebrew viewpoint. Rolf has argued it on list and in his dissertation.
> There are, of course, formal, semantic, and pragmatic distinctions between
> wayyiqtol and yiqtol, recognized by almost all who have studied the
> comparative
> Semitic evidence, apparently recognized by the LXX, Syriac, and targumists
> all,
> as well as conforming to the 'transmitted text'. aka MT.
> This list probably doesn't need to repeat everything that has been said
> ad nauseum.
>
>
> --
> Randall Buth, PhD
> www.biblicalulpan.org
> randallbuth AT gmail.com
> Biblical Language Center
> Learn Easily - Progress Further - Remember for Life
> _______________________________________________
> b-hebrew mailing list
> b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew
>
>
> --
> Internal Virus Database is out-of-date.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 268.18.3/696 - Release Date: 02/21/2007
3:19 PM
>
>
-
Re: [b-hebrew] no to aspect
, (continued)
-
Re: [b-hebrew] no to aspect,
Isaac Fried, 02/03/2011
-
Re: [b-hebrew] no to aspect,
Rolf Furuli, 02/03/2011
- Re: [b-hebrew] no to aspect, Rolf Furuli, 02/03/2011
-
Re: [b-hebrew] no to aspect,
Bryant J. Williams III, 02/03/2011
- Re: [b-hebrew] no to aspect, Rolf Furuli, 02/03/2011
-
Re: [b-hebrew] no to aspect,
Isaac Fried, 02/03/2011
-
Re: [b-hebrew] no to aspect,
fred burlingame, 02/03/2011
-
Re: [b-hebrew] no to aspect,
Isaac Fried, 02/03/2011
- Re: [b-hebrew] no to aspect, fred burlingame, 02/03/2011
-
Re: [b-hebrew] no to aspect,
Isaac Fried, 02/03/2011
-
Re: [b-hebrew] no to aspect,
fred burlingame, 02/03/2011
-
Re: [b-hebrew] no to aspect,
Rolf Furuli, 02/03/2011
-
[b-hebrew] no to aspect,
Randall Buth, 02/04/2011
-
Re: [b-hebrew] no to aspect,
Bryant J. Williams III, 02/04/2011
-
Re: [b-hebrew] no to aspect,
Randall Buth, 02/05/2011
-
Re: [b-hebrew] no to aspect,
Rolf Furuli, 02/05/2011
- Re: [b-hebrew] no to aspect, Isaac Fried, 02/05/2011
-
Re: [b-hebrew] no to aspect,
Rolf Furuli, 02/05/2011
-
Re: [b-hebrew] no to aspect,
Randall Buth, 02/05/2011
- Re: [b-hebrew] no to aspect, Isaac Fried, 02/04/2011
- Re: [b-hebrew] no to aspect, Rolf Furuli, 02/05/2011
-
Message not available
-
Re: [b-hebrew] no to aspect,
K Randolph, 02/05/2011
-
Message not available
-
Re: [b-hebrew] no to aspect,
K Randolph, 02/06/2011
- Re: [b-hebrew] no to aspect, Isaac Fried, 02/06/2011
-
Re: [b-hebrew] no to aspect,
K Randolph, 02/06/2011
-
Message not available
-
Re: [b-hebrew] no to aspect,
Rolf Furuli, 02/07/2011
- Re: [b-hebrew] no to aspect, Isaac Fried, 02/07/2011
-
Re: [b-hebrew] no to aspect,
K Randolph, 02/05/2011
-
Re: [b-hebrew] no to aspect,
Bryant J. Williams III, 02/04/2011
-
Re: [b-hebrew] no to aspect,
Isaac Fried, 02/03/2011
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.