b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
- From: Rolf Furuli <furuli AT online.no>
- To: "To:"@lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] no to aspect
- Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2011 15:48:23 +0100
Dear Isaac,
A small correction to my previous post: The reference "1:2" should be "1:3."
Best regards,
Rolf Furuli
Dear Isaac,
We may use verbs in Genesis , chapters 1 and 2, as examples.
Those who accept that Classical Hebrew is an aspectual language, accepts that YIQTOL is imperfective and QATAL is perfective.
The QATAL of 1:1 and 2:5 have past reference, and the two YIQTOLs of 2:5 and the one of 2:6 have past reference as well.
1:1 : BR) - perfective
2:5: HYH and ZMH - imperfective
2:5 M+R - perfective
2:6 (LH - imperfective
In addition to YIQTOL, I analyze WAYYIQTOL and WEYIQTIL as imperfective, and WEQATAL as perfective.
Both the QATAL of 1:2 and the YIQTOL of 2:6 have past reference.
1:2 )MR - imperfective
2:6 $QH - perfective
The conclusion of the comments above is that Classical Hebrew has only two conjugations. All prefix forms, with and without the conjunction WAW, are imperfective, and the suffix forms, with and without WAW, are perfective. Tense (=grammaticalized location in time) is nonexistent,
Best regards,
Rolf Furuli
Those who view Classical Hebrew as an aspectual language
Can we have examples for this as they appear the Hebrew bible?_______________________________________________
Isaac Fried, Boston University
On Feb 3, 2011, at 2:27 AM, Rolf Furuli wrote:
perfective and imperfective aspect respectively?
b-hebrew mailing list
b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew
-
[b-hebrew] no to aspect,
Nir cohen - Prof. Mat., 02/02/2011
- Re: [b-hebrew] no to aspect, dwashbur, 02/02/2011
- Re: [b-hebrew] no to aspect, fred burlingame, 02/02/2011
-
Re: [b-hebrew] no to aspect,
Rolf Furuli, 02/03/2011
-
Re: [b-hebrew] no to aspect,
Isaac Fried, 02/03/2011
-
Re: [b-hebrew] no to aspect,
Rolf Furuli, 02/03/2011
- Re: [b-hebrew] no to aspect, Rolf Furuli, 02/03/2011
-
Re: [b-hebrew] no to aspect,
Bryant J. Williams III, 02/03/2011
- Re: [b-hebrew] no to aspect, Rolf Furuli, 02/03/2011
-
Re: [b-hebrew] no to aspect,
Isaac Fried, 02/03/2011
-
Re: [b-hebrew] no to aspect,
fred burlingame, 02/03/2011
-
Re: [b-hebrew] no to aspect,
Isaac Fried, 02/03/2011
- Re: [b-hebrew] no to aspect, fred burlingame, 02/03/2011
-
Re: [b-hebrew] no to aspect,
Isaac Fried, 02/03/2011
-
Re: [b-hebrew] no to aspect,
fred burlingame, 02/03/2011
-
Re: [b-hebrew] no to aspect,
Rolf Furuli, 02/03/2011
-
Re: [b-hebrew] no to aspect,
Isaac Fried, 02/03/2011
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
-
[b-hebrew] no to aspect,
Randall Buth, 02/04/2011
-
Re: [b-hebrew] no to aspect,
Bryant J. Williams III, 02/04/2011
-
Re: [b-hebrew] no to aspect,
Randall Buth, 02/05/2011
- Re: [b-hebrew] no to aspect, Rolf Furuli, 02/05/2011
-
Re: [b-hebrew] no to aspect,
Randall Buth, 02/05/2011
-
Re: [b-hebrew] no to aspect,
Bryant J. Williams III, 02/04/2011
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.