b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum

List archive

Re: [b-hebrew] no to aspect

From: Isaac Fried <if AT math.bu.edu>
To: Randall Buth <randallbuth AT gmail.com>
Cc: Hebrew <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] no to aspect
Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2011 17:35:52 -0500

Of course they are different; VA-YI-QTOL is YI-QTOL with the added verb VA.

Isaac Fried, Boston University

On Feb 4, 2011, at 3:02 PM, Randall Buth wrote:

There are, of course, formal, semantic, and pragmatic distinctions between
wayyiqtol and yiqtol, recognized by almost all

Re: [b-hebrew] no to aspect , (continued)
- [b-hebrew] no to aspect, Randall Buth, 02/04/2011
  - Re: [b-hebrew] no to aspect, Bryant J. Williams III, 02/04/2011
    - Re: [b-hebrew] no to aspect, Randall Buth, 02/05/2011
      - Re: [b-hebrew] no to aspect, Rolf Furuli, 02/05/2011
        
        Re: [b-hebrew] no to aspect, Isaac Fried, 02/05/2011
  - Re: [b-hebrew] no to aspect, Isaac Fried, 02/04/2011
  - Re: [b-hebrew] no to aspect, Rolf Furuli, 02/05/2011
  - Message not available
    - Re: [b-hebrew] no to aspect, K Randolph, 02/05/2011
      - Message not available
        
        Re: [b-hebrew] no to aspect, K Randolph, 02/06/2011
        
        Re: [b-hebrew] no to aspect, Isaac Fried, 02/06/2011
      - Re: [b-hebrew] no to aspect, Rolf Furuli, 02/07/2011
        
        Re: [b-hebrew] no to aspect, Isaac Fried, 02/07/2011
      - Message not available
        
        Re: [b-hebrew] no to aspect, K Randolph, 02/07/2011
        
        Re: [b-hebrew] no to aspect, Rolf Furuli, 02/08/2011
        
        Message not available
        
        Re: [b-hebrew] no to aspect, K Randolph, 02/09/2011
- [b-hebrew] no to aspect, Randall Buth, 02/07/2011