b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
- From: "Bryant J. Williams III" <bjwvmw AT com-pair.net>
- To: <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>, "Rolf Furuli" <furuli AT online.no>
- Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] no to aspect
- Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2011 06:58:10 -0800
Dear Rolf,
Okay, you have described what the QTL and YQTL are in narrative, but is there
any difference in the poetic, prophetic and apocalyptic genres?
Rev. Bryant J. Williams III
----- Original Message -----
From: "Rolf Furuli" <furuli AT online.no>
To: <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2011 6:38 AM
Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] no to aspect
> Dear Isaac,
>
> We may use verbs in Genesis , chapters 1 and 2, as examples.
>
> Those who accept that Classical Hebrew is an aspectual language,
> accepts that YIQTOL is imperfective and QATAL is perfective.
>
> The QATAL of 1:1 and 2:5 have past reference, and the two YIQTOLs of
> 2:5 and the one of 2:6 have past reference as well.
>
> 1:1 : BR) - perfective
>
> 2:5: HYH and ZMH - imperfective
> 2:5 M+R - perfective
>
> 2:6 (LH - imperfective
>
> In addition to YIQTOL, I analyze WAYYIQTOL and WEYIQTIL as
> imperfective, and WEQATAL as perfective.
>
> Both the QATAL of 1:2 and the YIQTOL of 2:6 have past reference.
>
> 1:2 )MR - imperfective
>
> 2:6 $QH - perfective
>
> The conclusion of the comments above is that Classical Hebrew has
> only two conjugations. All prefix forms, with and without the
> conjunction WAW, are imperfective, and the suffix forms, with and
> without WAW, are perfective. Tense (=grammaticalized location in
> time) is nonexistent,
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Rolf Furuli
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Those who view Classical Hebrew as an aspectual language
>
>
> >Can we have examples for this as they appear the Hebrew bible?
> >
> >Isaac Fried, Boston University
> >
> >On Feb 3, 2011, at 2:27 AM, Rolf Furuli wrote:
> >
> >>perfective and imperfective aspect respectively?
> _______________________________________________
> b-hebrew mailing list
> b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew
>
>
> --
> Internal Virus Database is out-of-date.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 268.18.3/696 - Release Date: 02/21/2007
3:19 PM
>
>
-
[b-hebrew] no to aspect,
Nir cohen - Prof. Mat., 02/02/2011
- Re: [b-hebrew] no to aspect, dwashbur, 02/02/2011
- Re: [b-hebrew] no to aspect, fred burlingame, 02/02/2011
-
Re: [b-hebrew] no to aspect,
Rolf Furuli, 02/03/2011
-
Re: [b-hebrew] no to aspect,
Isaac Fried, 02/03/2011
-
Re: [b-hebrew] no to aspect,
Rolf Furuli, 02/03/2011
- Re: [b-hebrew] no to aspect, Rolf Furuli, 02/03/2011
-
Re: [b-hebrew] no to aspect,
Bryant J. Williams III, 02/03/2011
- Re: [b-hebrew] no to aspect, Rolf Furuli, 02/03/2011
-
Re: [b-hebrew] no to aspect,
Isaac Fried, 02/03/2011
-
Re: [b-hebrew] no to aspect,
fred burlingame, 02/03/2011
-
Re: [b-hebrew] no to aspect,
Isaac Fried, 02/03/2011
- Re: [b-hebrew] no to aspect, fred burlingame, 02/03/2011
-
Re: [b-hebrew] no to aspect,
Isaac Fried, 02/03/2011
-
Re: [b-hebrew] no to aspect,
fred burlingame, 02/03/2011
-
Re: [b-hebrew] no to aspect,
Rolf Furuli, 02/03/2011
-
Re: [b-hebrew] no to aspect,
Isaac Fried, 02/03/2011
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
-
[b-hebrew] no to aspect,
Randall Buth, 02/04/2011
-
Re: [b-hebrew] no to aspect,
Bryant J. Williams III, 02/04/2011
-
Re: [b-hebrew] no to aspect,
Randall Buth, 02/05/2011
-
Re: [b-hebrew] no to aspect,
Rolf Furuli, 02/05/2011
- Re: [b-hebrew] no to aspect, Isaac Fried, 02/05/2011
-
Re: [b-hebrew] no to aspect,
Rolf Furuli, 02/05/2011
-
Re: [b-hebrew] no to aspect,
Randall Buth, 02/05/2011
-
Re: [b-hebrew] no to aspect,
Bryant J. Williams III, 02/04/2011
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.