b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
- From: Randall Buth <randallbuth AT gmail.com>
- To: Hebrew <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: [b-hebrew] no to aspect
- Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2011 22:02:05 +0200
>Dear Bryant,
> No, all the prefix forms are imperfective in all genres, and all the
> suffix forms are perfective in all genres.
Bryant,
That expresses a VERY idiosyncratic viewpoint. Some/most would say a non-
Hebrew viewpoint. Rolf has argued it on list and in his dissertation.
There are, of course, formal, semantic, and pragmatic distinctions between
wayyiqtol and yiqtol, recognized by almost all who have studied the
comparative
Semitic evidence, apparently recognized by the LXX, Syriac, and targumists
all,
as well as conforming to the 'transmitted text'. aka MT.
This list probably doesn't need to repeat everything that has been said
ad nauseum.
--
Randall Buth, PhD
www.biblicalulpan.org
randallbuth AT gmail.com
Biblical Language Center
Learn Easily - Progress Further - Remember for Life
-
Re: [b-hebrew] no to aspect
, (continued)
-
Re: [b-hebrew] no to aspect,
Rolf Furuli, 02/03/2011
-
Re: [b-hebrew] no to aspect,
Isaac Fried, 02/03/2011
-
Re: [b-hebrew] no to aspect,
Rolf Furuli, 02/03/2011
- Re: [b-hebrew] no to aspect, Rolf Furuli, 02/03/2011
-
Re: [b-hebrew] no to aspect,
Bryant J. Williams III, 02/03/2011
- Re: [b-hebrew] no to aspect, Rolf Furuli, 02/03/2011
-
Re: [b-hebrew] no to aspect,
Isaac Fried, 02/03/2011
-
Re: [b-hebrew] no to aspect,
fred burlingame, 02/03/2011
-
Re: [b-hebrew] no to aspect,
Isaac Fried, 02/03/2011
- Re: [b-hebrew] no to aspect, fred burlingame, 02/03/2011
-
Re: [b-hebrew] no to aspect,
Isaac Fried, 02/03/2011
-
Re: [b-hebrew] no to aspect,
fred burlingame, 02/03/2011
-
Re: [b-hebrew] no to aspect,
Rolf Furuli, 02/03/2011
-
Re: [b-hebrew] no to aspect,
Isaac Fried, 02/03/2011
-
[b-hebrew] no to aspect,
Randall Buth, 02/04/2011
-
Re: [b-hebrew] no to aspect,
Bryant J. Williams III, 02/04/2011
-
Re: [b-hebrew] no to aspect,
Randall Buth, 02/05/2011
-
Re: [b-hebrew] no to aspect,
Rolf Furuli, 02/05/2011
- Re: [b-hebrew] no to aspect, Isaac Fried, 02/05/2011
-
Re: [b-hebrew] no to aspect,
Rolf Furuli, 02/05/2011
-
Re: [b-hebrew] no to aspect,
Randall Buth, 02/05/2011
- Re: [b-hebrew] no to aspect, Isaac Fried, 02/04/2011
- Re: [b-hebrew] no to aspect, Rolf Furuli, 02/05/2011
-
Message not available
-
Re: [b-hebrew] no to aspect,
K Randolph, 02/05/2011
-
Message not available
-
Re: [b-hebrew] no to aspect,
K Randolph, 02/06/2011
- Re: [b-hebrew] no to aspect, Isaac Fried, 02/06/2011
-
Re: [b-hebrew] no to aspect,
K Randolph, 02/06/2011
-
Message not available
- Re: [b-hebrew] no to aspect, Rolf Furuli, 02/07/2011
-
Re: [b-hebrew] no to aspect,
K Randolph, 02/05/2011
-
Re: [b-hebrew] no to aspect,
Bryant J. Williams III, 02/04/2011
-
Re: [b-hebrew] no to aspect,
Rolf Furuli, 02/03/2011
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.