b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
- From: Randall Buth <randallbuth AT gmail.com>
- To: Hebrew <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: [b-hebrew] Better concordance?
- Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2010 20:33:04 +0200
> Yitzhak Sapir katab
>Actually, Arabic is the evidence that the -h was pronounced. It is hard to
explain why both Hebrew and Arabic chose to add an "h" type letter to
denote the feminine that alternates between t and h. Why wouldn't Arabic
choose something based on ta and alif? >
We don't know why Arabic chose 'h' instead of " ' ".
It's a good question.
But we can't assume that when they dropped the -t they added an -h SOUND.
That a dialect or two eventually did so, doesn't really change things. The
standard pronunciations and Arabic dialects that I know, do not pronounce
the 'h', and the predecessor was *-at(un), without an 'h'.
>Furthermore, there is evidence
of rhymes. For a specific example of sura 98, you can see here:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.lang/browse_thread/thread/80dff4f8cf5d1c53/131203c347a2097b#msg_131203c347a2097b
>
Rhyme is weak evidence because Arabic is a metrical poetry and there
wouldn't be any problem in having one line slightly off 'close' rhyme.
(I didn't check the check to see how the ta-marbuta's would actually
have been vocalized vis a vis the last line.)
>This evidence (rhymes etc) is also mentioned by Blau, "The Parallel
Development of the Feminine Marker." Blau also mentions that a weak
h is pronounced in some modern Arabic dialects. As you might guess,
Blau suggests that parallel processes in different languages contributed
to this situation, and does not suggest that the -h was pronounced in
Hebrew.>
I haven't read the article, though parallel processes seems pretty certain,
that is, one did not fully import and borrow a system into the other. One
could not explain the development of Hebrew orthography, like the -h
in DSS or the words without -h in inscriptions. And I'm glad that Blau
doesn't suggest that feminine -h in Hebrew was pronounced. He is a
good linguist.
--
Randall Buth, PhD
www.biblicalulpan.org
randallbuth AT gmail.com
Biblical Language Center
Learn Easily - Progress Further - Remember for Life
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Better concordance?
, (continued)
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Better concordance?,
Yodan, 02/22/2010
- Re: [b-hebrew] Better concordance?, Pere Porta, 02/22/2010
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Better concordance?,
Isaac Fried, 02/22/2010
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Better concordance?,
Pere Porta, 02/22/2010
- [b-hebrew] Crop your posts, George Athas, 02/22/2010
- Re: [b-hebrew] Better concordance?, Isaac Fried, 02/22/2010
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Better concordance?,
Pere Porta, 02/22/2010
- [b-hebrew] Better concordance?, Randall Buth, 02/22/2010
-
[b-hebrew] Better concordance?,
Randall Buth, 02/22/2010
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Better concordance?,
Yitzhak Sapir, 02/22/2010
- Re: [b-hebrew] Better concordance?, Kevin Riley, 02/22/2010
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Better concordance?,
Yitzhak Sapir, 02/22/2010
- [b-hebrew] Better concordance?, Randall Buth, 02/22/2010
-
[b-hebrew] Better concordance?,
Randall Buth, 02/23/2010
- Re: [b-hebrew] Better concordance?, Yigal Levin, 02/23/2010
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Better concordance?,
Yodan, 02/22/2010
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.