Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

b-hebrew - Re: [b-hebrew] Vowel Subsitution

b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "Barry" <nebarry AT verizon.net>
  • To: <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] Vowel Subsitution
  • Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2009 10:35:07 -0500



--------------------------------------------------
From: <tedbro AT aol.com>
Sent: Monday, December 28, 2009 9:28 AM
To: <nebarry AT verizon.net>; <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] Vowel Subsitution

Hi, Barry:

Greetings, and thanks for the response. Commentariis interspersis infra:

The only difference is the presence of a simple shva on the yod of YHWH and
a compound shva (patach hateph) on the initial aleph of Adonai.

When words are lengthened in Hebrew, the vowel in the beginning often
weakens and becomes a shva.

Right, I get that.

Thus the word for prophet, navi becomes nebiim. The qamatz that stands
under the nun in navi weakens and is replaced with shva, a non-vowel. But since
the combination nun bet is hard to say, the shva takes on a touch of vowel
coloring and become a vocal shva. In practice is it pronounced as an "e".
But it is not that the "a" become an "e" in the plural, rather that the "a"
disappears as the accent in the word shift toward the back in the plural.

So far, so good.

Likewise for the word El (God), the initial aleph, takes a sere, a long e
sound. But when el is lengthened into a plural, and becomes elohim, the
accent shifts to the end of the word and the vowel at the beginning of the word
is weakened into a shva.

Ok.

Further since the first letter of elohim is aleph, it follows special rules
for the gutterals, (Gesenius explains this) and becomes a seghol hateph,
one of the three special forms of shva used with gutterals. Ditto with
Adonai. Adon has a qamatz under the initial aleph, but Adonai has a compound
shva (patach hateph).

I actually remember all this.

Non gutterals never take compound shvas. Not patach hateph, not seghol
hateph, not qamatz hateph.

Likewise, yod never carries a compound shva. Yod always takes a simple
shva.

The fact that Adonai has a compound shva and the MT texts of YHWH have a
simple shva is not evidence of a different vowel. It is the same vowel,
applied to a different letter.

Ok, maybe I'm failing to make a connection here. We pronounce the qere. Are you saying because the initial vowel for Adonai, the patach hateph, is written under the yod for YHWH, it changes to a simple sheva? It sounds like you are saying that even though the qere is Adonai, the visual orthography trumps the actual pronunciation, as though the initial vowel of Adonai were a yod rather than an aleph?

N.E. Barry Hofstetter

Fecisti nos ad te et inquietum est cor nostrum, donec requiescat in te...
-- Augustine, Confessions 1:1

http://mysite.verizon.net/nebarry/
http://my.opera.com/BarryHofstetter/blog/




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page