b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
- From: "Yodan" <Yodan AT Yodanco.com>
- To: "'Yigal Levin'" <leviny1 AT mail.biu.ac.il>, "'b-hebrew'" <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] virginity
- Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2007 23:46:59 -0700
Thanks for suggesting a more appropriate title. Not only the title is no
longer valid, it seems to me that the discussion in of this topic is not
longer a b-Hebrew discussion... it has gone way into theology on the one
hand and into cultural/societal/legal etc. issues on the other hand. I hope
that we'll get back to Biblical Hebrew discussion soon.
Rivka Sherman-Gold
*********************************
-----Original Message-----
From: b-hebrew-bounces AT lists.ibiblio.org
[mailto:b-hebrew-bounces AT lists.ibiblio.org] On Behalf Of Yigal Levin
Sent: Sunday, July 15, 2007 11:20 PM
To: b-hebrew
Subject: [b-hebrew] virginity
People,
Since we're no longer really discussing either "Definite Article" or "Isaiah
7:14", please change the subject line to "virginity".
Thank y'all,
Yigal Levin
co-moderator
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tory Thorpe" <torythrp AT yahoo.com>
To: <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
Sent: Monday, July 16, 2007 9:07 AM
Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] Definite Article 7:14
> On Jul 16, 2007, at 1:25 AM, dwashbur AT nyx.net wrote:
>
>> How does Gen 34:3 suggest any lack of physical virginity? Are you
>> basing this idea on the
>> fact that PARQENOS in that verse translates NA(AR in Hebrew? I
>> have no idea what your
>> point is from this verse, or how it "shows" anything.
>>
>> Dave Washburn
>> But I can't say Sylvester, George!
>
> It's very simple. If the word PARQENOS meant only physical virginity
> to Alexandrian Jewish translators then Dinah was still a physical
> virgin even after being raped according to the Greek translation of
> Gen. xxxiv 3. Now I suppose its possible the translators may have
> felt that Dinah remained pure and that by some miracle her hymen was
> not broken; but it is painfully obvious that the usage of PARQENOS
> among Jews in the 3rd century BCE could not have been limited to
> women who never had intercourse. One simply has to keep this in mind
> when reading the Greek version of Isa. vii 14.
>
> Tory Thorpe
> _______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
b-hebrew mailing list
b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Definite Article 7:14
, (continued)
- Re: [b-hebrew] Definite Article 7:14, Harold Holmyard, 07/15/2007
- Re: [b-hebrew] Definite Article 7:14, Isaac Fried, 07/15/2007
- Re: [b-hebrew] Definite Article 7:14, Harold Holmyard, 07/15/2007
- Re: [b-hebrew] Definite Article 7:14, Peter Kirk, 07/16/2007
- Re: [b-hebrew] Definite Article 7:14, Tory Thorpe, 07/15/2007
- Re: [b-hebrew] Definite Article 7:14, Harold Holmyard, 07/15/2007
- Re: [b-hebrew] Definite Article 7:14, Tory Thorpe, 07/16/2007
- Re: [b-hebrew] Definite Article 7:14, dwashbur, 07/16/2007
- Re: [b-hebrew] Definite Article 7:14, Tory Thorpe, 07/16/2007
- [b-hebrew] virginity, Yigal Levin, 07/16/2007
- Re: [b-hebrew] virginity, Yodan, 07/16/2007
- Re: [b-hebrew] virginity, Yigal Levin, 07/16/2007
- Re: [b-hebrew] Definite Article 7:14, K Randolph, 07/16/2007
- Re: [b-hebrew] Definite Article 7:14, dwashbur, 07/16/2007
- Re: [b-hebrew] Definite Article 7:14, Tory Thorpe, 07/16/2007
- Re: [b-hebrew] Definite Article 7:14, dwashbur, 07/16/2007
- Re: [b-hebrew] Definite Article 7:14, Tory Thorpe, 07/16/2007
- Re: [b-hebrew] Definite Article 7:14, dwashbur, 07/16/2007
- Re: [b-hebrew] Definite Article 7:14, Tory Thorpe, 07/16/2007
- Re: [b-hebrew] Definite Article 7:14, dwashbur, 07/16/2007
- Re: [b-hebrew] Definite Article 7:14, Tory Thorpe, 07/16/2007
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.