Biblical Hebrew Forum

[Tory Thorpe <torythrp AT yahoo.com>]

On Jul 16, 2007, at 12:44 PM, dwashbur AT nyx.net wrote:

> Once again, as Peter already pointed out, you retreat into the  
> accusation that anybody who
> disagrees with you must be theologically or doctrinally motivated.   
> You're the one with the
> conspiracy theory, not Karl or I.  Obviously, it's a conspiracy by  
> those rakkafrakka Christians
> to make you look silly...no, wait, you're doing that all yourself.   
> Never mind.

What else would you call the insinuation of Hebraists altering the  
meaning of almah because of christian dogma? How is that completely  
unsubstantiated charge, a familiar one, acceptable in this forum but  
my labeling it a conspiracy theory not?

Tory Thorpe