b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
Re: [b-hebrew] Septuagint vs Hebrew, effect on Christianity
- From: Yigal Levin <leviny1 AT mail.biu.ac.il>
- To: b-hebrew <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] Septuagint vs Hebrew, effect on Christianity
- Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2006 08:08:06 +0200
Dear Shoshanna,
While all you wrote below is true, it is not really relevant. The Ketubah and the rabbinic literature that it is a part of reflect the use of the words "betulah" and "almah" in a "legalese" termanology from a thousand years after the time of Isaiah, in a world that was very different than that of Iron Age Israel. It would be more relevant to check in what other contexts the words are used in the Tanakh, and in cognate ANE languages of the same period. Then you can generalize about whether a "betulah" can be assumed to be a "reall" virgin and whether an "almah" is usually unmarried.
Yigal Levin
----- Original Message ----- From: "Shoshanna Walker" <rosewalk AT concentric.net>
To: <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
Sent: Monday, October 16, 2006 6:27 AM
Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] Septuagint vs Hebrew, effect on Christianity
Maybe. But that would be an assumption, not the working definition.
Just as today, it is an "assumption" - but we know very well that it
is not always the case - that an unmarried woman is a virgin.
And it is only the distinction between a woman who was previously
married, whether she was widowed or divorced, and a woman who was
never married, which makes a big difference in the conditions in the
Ketuba (ie the money she is entitled to, from the groom and/or his
family, if he divorces her). No one really probes into her private
life, to determine if she is a virgin or not, in order to designate
the conditions in the Ketuba.
Also, whether or not she is a convert to Judaism - but that is a
different matter.
But - if she had a child, and was never married - then they use the
word "It'ta" - which simply means "woman" - since they cannot pretend
that she is a betulta - which "assumes", as you say, that she is a
virgin. I don't remember off hand, in this case, whether the money
she is entitled to, is the same as if she had never been married, or
the same as if she had been widowed or divorced or converted - I can
look it up, not now - it's after midnight.
Shoshanna
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Septuagint vs Hebrew, effect on Christianity
, (continued)
- Re: [b-hebrew] Septuagint vs Hebrew, effect on Christianity, Harold Holmyard, 10/16/2006
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Septuagint vs Hebrew, effect on Christianity,
Harold Holmyard, 10/16/2006
-
Message not available
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Septuagint vs Hebrew, Josephus and Philo,
Harold Holmyard, 10/16/2006
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Septuagint vs Hebrew, Josephus and Philo,
Peter Kirk, 10/16/2006
- Re: [b-hebrew] Septuagint vs Hebrew, Josephus and Philo, Harold Holmyard, 10/16/2006
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Septuagint vs Hebrew, Josephus and Philo,
Peter Kirk, 10/16/2006
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Septuagint vs Hebrew, Josephus and Philo,
Harold Holmyard, 10/16/2006
-
Message not available
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Septuagint vs Hebrew, effect on Christianity,
Shoshanna Walker, 10/15/2006
- Re: [b-hebrew] Septuagint vs Hebrew, effect on Christianity, dwashbur, 10/16/2006
- Re: [b-hebrew] Septuagint vs Hebrew, effect on Christianity, Yigal Levin, 10/16/2006
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Septuagint vs Hebrew, effect on Christianity,
Harold Holmyard, 10/16/2006
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Septuagint vs Hebrew, effect on Christianity,
Peter Kirk, 10/17/2006
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Septuagint vs Hebrew, effect on Christianity,
Harold Holmyard, 10/17/2006
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Septuagint vs Hebrew, effect on Christianity,
Peter Kirk, 10/18/2006
- Re: [b-hebrew] Septuagint vs Hebrew, effect on Christianity, Harold Holmyard, 10/18/2006
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Septuagint vs Hebrew, effect on Christianity,
Peter Kirk, 10/18/2006
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Septuagint vs Hebrew, effect on Christianity,
Harold Holmyard, 10/17/2006
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Septuagint vs Hebrew, effect on Christianity,
Peter Kirk, 10/17/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.