Biblical Hebrew Forum

[Harold Holmyard <hholmyard AT ont.com>]

Peter Kirk wrote:

> > HH: Because I had the time and interest to pursue it adequately for my 
> > purpose, which was to clarify that the man was unreliable.

> But since you had not researched the issue properly, and had not even 
> properly examined the article from which you took the accusations of 
> unreliability, you did not have proper grounds to claim that the man was 
> unreliable.

HH: Yes, I did have proper grounds to claim that 
he was unreliable. I gave several valid grounds on 
which I based my assertion that he was unreliable. 
One does not necessarily have to read everything a 
person writes to know he is unreliable. And I read 
more than I commented on here on the list, though 
not the entire article of fifty pages. This is a 
discussion group, not a university seminar or a 
theological journal, so your demands of what I 
must do before I can speak have no real 
legitimacy. I am not obligated to do anything 
except believe I know what I'm talking about.

Yours,
Harold Holmyard