b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
- From: kgraham0938 AT comcast.net
- To: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] "I Am" vs. "I Will Be"
- Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2006 21:35:17 +0000
For my part, I have argued here before that "I will be" does not answer
Moses' question. Namely "what is your name?"
--
Kelton Graham
KGRAHAM0938 AT comcast.net
-------------- Original message --------------
From: Harold Holmyard <hholmyard AT ont.com>
> Awohili AT aol.com wrote:
>
> >
> >It's quite simple. I'm not fishing. I asked a question, which has been
> >ignored. I'd like a cogent answer to my question, which no one has
> >answered
> yet.
> >
> >
>
> HH: The answer is that the context is different in the two verses,
> calling for a different handling of the verb in English. If a verb is
> imperfective in aspect, then it can be present or future. The original
> hearer would have adjusted according to the context. The future simply
> does not suit 3:14b well, as has already been explained. To name
> yourself "I will be" without a predicate leaves the hearer with a God
> who exists in the future but perhaps not in the present. But the future
> does suit 3:12 well. You could translate 3:12 as "I am with you," but
> the futuristic context makes that less appropriate in English. The fact
> is that God was with Moses at that moment and would be with him at every
> step from that time onwards. It was partially for this reason that God
> sought to put him to death when he attempted to return to Egypt without
> having circumcised his son (Ex 4:24-25). God as with him, and he was
> not free any longer to ignore the demands of God's covenant with
> Abraham. So in a technical sense "I am with you" would be correct.
>
> Yours,
> Harold Holmyard
>
>
> >
> >Solomon Landers
> >
> >In a message dated 06/29/2006 1:29:23 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
> >dwashbur AT nyx.net writes:
> >
> >See the discussion for the various people's reasonings. I'm not sure what
> >it is that you
> >want. Again, if you don't find their arguments convincing, that's your
> >right as a free human
> >being. But you seem to be fishing for something, and it's difficult to
> >determine what.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >b-hebrew mailing list
> >b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
> >http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew
> >
> >.
> >
> >
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> b-hebrew mailing list
> b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew
>From hholmyard AT ont.com Thu Jun 29 17:41:40 2006
Return-Path: <hholmyard AT ont.com>
X-Original-To: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Delivered-To: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Received: from online.OnlineToday.Com (online.OnlineToday.Com [204.181.200.2])
by lists.ibiblio.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B1444C00B
for <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>; Thu, 29 Jun 2006 17:41:40 -0400
(EDT)
Received: from [204.181.205.27] (ta27.OnlineToday.Com [204.181.205.27])
by online.OnlineToday.Com (8.12.10/8.12.8) with ESMTP id
k5TLhleP015172
for <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>; Thu, 29 Jun 2006 16:43:48 -0500
(CDT)
Message-ID: <44A448BB.5040606 AT ont.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2006 16:40:11 -0500
From: Harold Holmyard <hholmyard AT ont.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Macintosh/20050923)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
References: <bb9.166e31.31d593e1 AT aol.com>
In-Reply-To: <bb9.166e31.31d593e1 AT aol.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] "I Am" vs. "I Will Be"
X-BeenThere: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.8
Precedence: list
List-Id: Biblical Hebrew Forum <b-hebrew.lists.ibiblio.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew>,
<mailto:b-hebrew-request AT lists.ibiblio.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.ibiblio.org/sympa/arc/b-hebrew>
List-Post: <mailto:b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sympa AT lists.ibiblio.org?subject=HELP>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew>,
<mailto:b-hebrew-request AT lists.ibiblio.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2006 21:41:40 -0000
I'm sorry for the typo. The first words in what I wrote below should be
"God was with him":
God as with him, and he was
not free any longer to ignore the demands of God's covenant with
Abraham. So in a technical sense "I am with you" would be correct.
Yours,
Harold Holmyard
-
[b-hebrew] "I Am" vs. "I Will Be",
Awohili, 06/29/2006
- Re: [b-hebrew] "I Am" vs. "I Will Be", dwashbur, 06/29/2006
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
-
Re: [b-hebrew] "I Am" vs. "I Will Be",
Awohili, 06/29/2006
- Re: [b-hebrew] "I Am" vs. "I Will Be", dwashbur, 06/29/2006
-
Re: [b-hebrew] "I Am" vs. "I Will Be",
Awohili, 06/29/2006
- Re: [b-hebrew] "I Am" vs. "I Will Be", dwashbur, 06/29/2006
-
Re: [b-hebrew] "I Am" vs. "I Will Be",
kgraham0938, 06/29/2006
-
Re: [b-hebrew] "I Am" vs. "I Will Be" (word order),
B. M. Rocine, 06/29/2006
- Re: [b-hebrew] "I Am" vs. "I Will Be" (word order), Rolf Furuli, 06/30/2006
- Re: [b-hebrew] "I Am" vs. "I Will Be" (cohortative?), B. M. Rocine, 06/29/2006
-
Re: [b-hebrew] "I Am" vs. "I Will Be" (word order),
B. M. Rocine, 06/29/2006
- Re: [b-hebrew] "I Am" vs. "I Will Be", Revdpickrel, 06/29/2006
- Re: [b-hebrew] "I Am" vs. "I Will Be", Karl Randolph, 06/29/2006
- Re: [b-hebrew] "I Am" vs. "I Will Be", Awohili, 06/29/2006
- Re: [b-hebrew] "I Am" vs. "I Will Be", Har1marjohn, 06/30/2006
- Re: [b-hebrew] "I Am" vs. "I Will Be", Awohili, 06/30/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.