b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
- From: Peter Kirk <peterkirk AT qaya.org>
- To: Vadim Cherny <VadimCherny AT mail.ru>
- Cc: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] Tenses and aspects; was: footnotes
- Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2005 22:40:38 +0100
On 08/08/2005 21:03, Vadim Cherny wrote:
...
1) "And he spoke (WAYYIQTOL) to her.: `Because I spoke (YIQTOL) to Naboth
the Jezreelite and said (WAYYIQTOL) to him...`" 1 Kings 21:6
See, Rolf, there are different speaking conventions. Russians can say,
"Because I *speak* to Nabot..." about the past event. Deictic center is the
meeting with Nabot. "Speak" is the present tense, no aspects.
Or, "Each time, as *I will meet* Nabot, I say to him..." Now, Russian is
very, very close to Hebrew in its mode of expression. ...
No, Vadim, it is not. In Russian each verb form has both aspect (perfective or imperfective) and tense (past, present or future - present is imperfective only), so two orthogonal parameters. Hebrew has nothing analogous to this set of two orthogonal parameters - there is just one distinction, which is of aspect in biblical Hebrew, according to most scholars, although of tense in modern Hebrew.
... Your example is
exactly similar: it was apparently customary in Hebrew, as now in Russian,
to use future tense with "as," "because," etc for past reference. ...
Please can you send me an example sentence in Russian, perhaps off list. In all my studies of Russian I have never seen a future tense with past reference in this sense.
... When you read English phrase "Every time I meet Nabot, I say to him...",
you
understand this as past reference - yet you don't dispute that "meet" is a
present tense, or that English has tenses. ...
No, this is not past, but indicates a habit which the speaker expects to continue. If the speaker expects not to say the same thing to Nabot again (e.g. because he is dead), then the past tense is used.
--
Peter Kirk
peter AT qaya.org (personal)
peterkirk AT qaya.org (work)
http://www.qaya.org/
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Tenses and aspects; was: footnotes
, (continued)
- Re: [b-hebrew] Tenses and aspects; was: footnotes, Vadim Cherny, 08/08/2005
- Re: [b-hebrew] Tenses and aspects; was: footnotes, Rolf Furuli, 08/08/2005
- Re: [b-hebrew] Tenses and aspects; was: footnotes, B. M. Rocine, 08/08/2005
- Re: [b-hebrew] Tenses and aspects; was: footnotes, Rolf Furuli, 08/08/2005
- Re: [b-hebrew] Tenses and aspects; was: footnotes, B. M. Rocine, 08/08/2005
- Re: [b-hebrew] Tenses and aspects; was: footnotes, Rolf Furuli, 08/08/2005
- Re: [b-hebrew] Tenses and aspects; was: footnotes, B. M. Rocine, 08/08/2005
- Re: [b-hebrew] Tenses and aspects; was: footnotes, Rolf Furuli, 08/08/2005
- Re: [b-hebrew] Tenses and aspects; was: footnotes, B. M. Rocine, 08/08/2005
- Re: [b-hebrew] Tenses and aspects; was: footnotes, Vadim Cherny, 08/08/2005
- Re: [b-hebrew] Tenses and aspects; was: footnotes, Peter Kirk, 08/08/2005
- Re: [b-hebrew] Tenses and aspects; was: footnotes, Vadim Cherny, 08/09/2005
- Re: [b-hebrew] Tenses and aspects; was: footnotes, Peter Kirk, 08/09/2005
- Re: [b-hebrew] Tenses and aspects; was: footnotes, Vadim Cherny, 08/09/2005
- Re: [b-hebrew] Tenses and aspects; was: footnotes, Peter Kirk, 08/09/2005
- Re: [b-hebrew] Tenses and aspects; was: footnotes, Ken Penner, 08/09/2005
- Re: [b-hebrew] Tenses and aspects; was: footnotes, Peter Kirk, 08/09/2005
- Re: [b-hebrew] Tenses and aspects; was: footnotes, Vadim Cherny, 08/10/2005
- Message not available
- Re: [b-hebrew] Tenses and aspects; was: footnotes, Vadim Cherny, 08/10/2005
- Re: [b-hebrew] Tenses and aspects; was: footnotes, Vadim Cherny, 08/09/2005
- Re: [b-hebrew] Tenses and aspects; was: footnotes, Peter Kirk, 08/08/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.