b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
- From: Peter Kirk <peterkirk AT qaya.org>
- To: Vadim Cherny <VadimCherny AT mail.ru>
- Cc: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] Tenses and aspects; was: footnotes
- Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2005 12:21:41 +0100
On 09/08/2005 07:18, Vadim Cherny wrote:
...OK, but this example does not use "as" or "because", and it uses a well known special idiom in which the formally past indicative form пошел/пошли is used as an imperative "go!". I think we all accept that there may be special idiomatic usages in which the normal tense rules do not apply. Also, it is a past tense with future reference, whereas you wrote before of future tense with past reference.
Russian,... Your example is
exactly similar: it was apparently customary in Hebrew, as now in
to use future tense with "as," "because," etc for past reference. ...Please can you send me an example sentence in Russian, perhaps off list.
In all my studies of Russian I have never seen a future tense with past
reference in this sense.
A person emphatically describing his earlier communication, and transposing
himself into the past deictic center: "He told me - get out. А я ему как
скажу - да пошел ты! (And I *as will tell* him - bug off!)" Even participle
is the same.
You are right. I tried an English example closest to the Russian. InYes, this is an example of future tense (встречу is not a present tense) with past reference. But is it really normal to write говорю (present) rather than говорил (past imperfective) when the person is dead and the activity has ceased? And if the verb in the main clause is past, does the verb in the subordinate clause remain future?
Russian, emphatic or colloquial, you can use present tense about the past
perfect events, "Каждый раз, как я его встречу, я ему говорю..." (Each time
I *will meet* him, I say to him) even about the very dead person.
--
Peter Kirk
peter AT qaya.org (personal)
peterkirk AT qaya.org (work)
http://www.qaya.org/
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Tenses and aspects; was: footnotes
, (continued)
- Re: [b-hebrew] Tenses and aspects; was: footnotes, B. M. Rocine, 08/08/2005
- Re: [b-hebrew] Tenses and aspects; was: footnotes, Rolf Furuli, 08/08/2005
- Re: [b-hebrew] Tenses and aspects; was: footnotes, B. M. Rocine, 08/08/2005
- Re: [b-hebrew] Tenses and aspects; was: footnotes, Rolf Furuli, 08/08/2005
- Re: [b-hebrew] Tenses and aspects; was: footnotes, B. M. Rocine, 08/08/2005
- Re: [b-hebrew] Tenses and aspects; was: footnotes, Rolf Furuli, 08/08/2005
- Re: [b-hebrew] Tenses and aspects; was: footnotes, B. M. Rocine, 08/08/2005
- Re: [b-hebrew] Tenses and aspects; was: footnotes, Vadim Cherny, 08/08/2005
- Re: [b-hebrew] Tenses and aspects; was: footnotes, Peter Kirk, 08/08/2005
- Re: [b-hebrew] Tenses and aspects; was: footnotes, Vadim Cherny, 08/09/2005
- Re: [b-hebrew] Tenses and aspects; was: footnotes, Peter Kirk, 08/09/2005
- Re: [b-hebrew] Tenses and aspects; was: footnotes, Vadim Cherny, 08/09/2005
- Re: [b-hebrew] Tenses and aspects; was: footnotes, Peter Kirk, 08/09/2005
- Re: [b-hebrew] Tenses and aspects; was: footnotes, Ken Penner, 08/09/2005
- Re: [b-hebrew] Tenses and aspects; was: footnotes, Peter Kirk, 08/09/2005
- Re: [b-hebrew] Tenses and aspects; was: footnotes, Vadim Cherny, 08/10/2005
- Message not available
- Re: [b-hebrew] Tenses and aspects; was: footnotes, Vadim Cherny, 08/10/2005
- Re: [b-hebrew] Tenses and aspects; was: footnotes, Vadim Cherny, 08/09/2005
- Re: [b-hebrew] Tenses and aspects; was: footnotes, Peter Kirk, 08/08/2005
- Re: [b-hebrew] Tenses and aspects; was: footnotes, Vadim Cherny, 08/08/2005
- Re: [b-hebrew] Tenses and aspects; was: footnotes, Peter Kirk, 08/08/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.