Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

b-hebrew - Re: [b-hebrew] Shishak

b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: MarianneLuban AT aol.com
  • To: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] Shishak
  • Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 21:25:54 EDT

In a message dated 8/26/2004 6:13:16 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
formoria AT carolina.rr.com writes:


> The discussion was not about those two individuals. It was about David
> Rohl. Are you putting all three men in the same category? And are all 3
> equally worth dismissal?

Even a broken watch is right twice in 24 hours. So a human being can be
correct here and there, as well. Was Nostradamus so different from Rohl and
Velikovsky?
Not if he was "guessing" ;-^ But everyone in Egyptology has to take a guess
now and then--in fact on plenty of occasions. I suppose it is once again a
question of how one phrases ones suppositions. Best to leave a question mark
there--a wise counsel we all do not always heed. And are usually sorry
later.
It is those who hardly ever leave a question mark and write things on the
order of "Now I am going to show you the statue of Joseph"--that tend to
alienate
the savants.




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page