Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

b-hebrew - Re: [b-hebrew] Shishak

b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Peter Kirk <peterkirk AT qaya.org>
  • To: "J. Raymond Kelley" <jraykelley AT prodigy.net>
  • Cc: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] Shishak
  • Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 11:06:02 +0100

On 27/08/2004 06:42, J. Raymond Kelley wrote:



Uri Hurwitz wrote:

Brian Roberts <formoria AT carolina.rr.com> wrote, inter alia:
".... your post has an elitist tone which is quite disturbing. Scholars are not a priesthood who can only be questioned seriously by other priests. We must not undervalue the perspective of the fresh eye, no matter whence it comes...."

Now this point of view is quite refreshing. To follow it through why reject Valikovsky, isn't that too a bit elitist? And while we are at it, how about Nostradamus?

Uri

Or Copernicus? Or Subrahmanyan Chandrasekhar?
If two is the magic number of examples ...

If you need three, try Wegener and his continental drift theory.


--
Peter Kirk
peter AT qaya.org (personal)
peterkirk AT qaya.org (work)
http://www.qaya.org/






Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page