Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

b-hebrew - [b-hebrew] Re: [Biblical-languages] A threat to the integrity of the Hebrew language?

b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Peter_Constable AT sil.org
  • To: Biblical Languages <biblical-languages AT lists.ibiblio.org>, Biblical Hebrew <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>, Hebrew Computing list <hebrewcomputing AT yahoogroups.com>
  • Cc:
  • Subject: [b-hebrew] Re: [Biblical-languages] A threat to the integrity of the Hebrew language?
  • Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2003 08:29:08 -0500

Dear all:

As author of the proposal document Peter Kirk has mentioned, I guess I
should respond. Please note that I do not do so defensively; I have
discussed this issue with Peter prior to his posting, and this is not a
matter of personal attack for me. I am merely wanting to work with
interested parties to obtain a solution to an existing problem so that
Biblical Hebrew texts can adequately be represented in Unicode.

The proposal document was no more than that: a proposal; a position that
gets expressed in writing and put out in public for discussion and
consideration. There has been enough response expressing concern over
dividing Biblical and Modern Hebrew data and implementations that this
proposal has a very low likelihood of being pursued.

There have been some suggestions that this proposal was part of a plot on
the part of Microsoft to make existing solutions obsolete thereby forcing
people to buy software upgrades. Nothing could be further from the truth.
Forcing new upgrades by intentionally breaking existing solutions would
cost MS *far* more in terms of negative PR and support costs than the
revenue they would get. Lots of people, including me, have loved to hate
MS, but this criticism simply doesn't wash.

The proposal to encode alternate characters for Biblical Hebrew was
prepared because it seemed to me after discussion with others connected
with the development of the Unicode and ISO 10646 standards to be the only
option available. Basic agreement to the idea had been expressed by an
Israeli involved in Hebrew encoding standards, and various parties
involved in development of font/rendering implementations and corpora had
expressed willingness to deal with the issues that solution would have
created (it seemed worth it to them if that was what was needed to obtain
a solution to the other existing problems). Of course, that group of
people may not have been (and, in light of feedback, was not)
representative of all those involved in development of BH software and
corpora, let alone users; but input from such others has now been
received, and is being given consideration to the extent that that
proposal will almost certainly be abandoned.

That leaves the problem of what alternate solution to propose. All along,
I have felt that the solution I would prefer to see is to correct the
canonical combining classes of characters (non-technical: to correct the
root cause of the existing problems). This is not a trivial matter,
though. In particular, there is very strong oppostion from certain parties
in industry involved in Internet standards to making any change of the
kind that would be required (this is a general oppostion related to all of
Unicode, not specifically related to Hebrew). The problem is that such a
change could create serious problems for existing data; this includes not
only Biblical Hebrew data, but also Modern Hebrew data that includes vowel
points.

Peter Kirk (and others) have suggested an alternate solution involving
insertion of an extra control character within vowel sequences, the effect
of which is to ensure those sequences are preserved. There have been
variations on this idea involving different Unicode control characters,
some of which would lead to other serious problems. There is one that may
work, though it needs further evaluation. As some have noted, this is a
kludge, but unfortunately the only solution that wouldn't feel like a
kludge is the one that would require overcoming strong resistence from
Internet standardizers.

To conclude, the supposed threat Peter Kirk mentioned is not very real,
though his effort has been useful in gaining input from a wider group of
users and implementers, and is certainly appreciated.


- Peter


---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Peter Constable

Non-Roman Script Initiative, SIL International
7500 W. Camp Wisdom Rd., Dallas, TX 75236, USA
Tel: +1 972 708 7485





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page