b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
- From: "Lisbeth S. Fried" <lizfried AT umich.edu>
- To: "B Hebrew" <b-hebrew AT franklin.oit.unc.edu>
- Subject: RE: Monotheism was: "admittedly syncretistic..
- Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2002 13:00:55 -0500
This
is my understanding as well. Therefore, a person who murders his slave
is
not
subject to a legal proceeding. If the slave has a family member to avenge his
death,
then
the family member can try to do so, I suppose. But how likely is
it?
A
slave then does not have the status a free person, which is no different
from
Hammurabi's Code.
Liz
-----Original Message-----In a message dated 1/27/02 12:38:55 AM Eastern Standard Time, lizfried AT umich.edu writes:
From: Bearpecs AT aol.com [mailto:Bearpecs AT aol.com]
Sent: Sun, January 27, 2002 12:47 PM
To: Biblical Hebrew
Subject: Re: Monotheism was: "admittedly syncretistic..
} I'm not sure about this.It seems if so, then it would say mut, yamut. I don't think a punishment,
I think Milgrom would say that 'mot yumat' applies to judicial execution by a court following a trial, whereas "naqom yenaqem" applies to blood vengeance by a family member.
Milgrom maintains that "karet" means that G-d will cut off the guilty party's bloodline, and possibly also that he will be denied an afterlife.
---
You are currently subscribed to b-hebrew as: [lizfried AT umich.edu]
To unsubscribe, forward this message to $subst('Email.Unsub')
To subscribe, send an email to join-b-hebrew AT franklin.oit.unc.edu.
-
RE: Monotheism was: "admittedly syncretistic..
, (continued)
-
RE: Monotheism was: "admittedly syncretistic..,
Lisbeth S. Fried, 01/26/2002
-
Re: Monotheism was: "admittedly syncretistic..,
Jonathan D. Safren, 01/26/2002
- RE: Monotheism was: "admittedly syncretistic.., Lisbeth S. Fried, 01/27/2002
-
Re: Monotheism was: "admittedly syncretistic..,
Jonathan D. Safren, 01/26/2002
- RE: Monotheism was: "admittedly syncretistic.., Rolf Furuli, 01/26/2002
- RE: Monotheism was: "admittedly syncretistic.., Peter Kirk, 01/26/2002
- Re: Monotheism was: "admittedly syncretistic.., Glenn Blank, 01/26/2002
- RE: Monotheism was: "admittedly syncretistic.., Lisbeth S. Fried, 01/26/2002
- Re: Monotheism was: "admittedly syncretistic.., Jonathan D. Safren, 01/27/2002
- Re: Monotheism was: "admittedly syncretistic.., Jonathan D. Safren, 01/27/2002
- Re: Monotheism was: "admittedly syncretistic.., Bearpecs, 01/27/2002
- RE: Monotheism was: "admittedly syncretistic.., Lisbeth S. Fried, 01/27/2002
- RE: Monotheism was: "admittedly syncretistic.., Peter Kirk, 01/27/2002
-
Re: Monotheism was: "admittedly syncretistic..,
Jonathan D. Safren, 01/27/2002
- RE: Monotheism was: "admittedly syncretistic.., Peter Kirk, 01/27/2002
- Re: Monotheism was: "admittedly syncretistic.., Rolf Furuli, 01/27/2002
- Re: Monotheism was: "admittedly syncretistic.., Awohili, 01/27/2002
- RE: Monotheism was: "admittedly syncretistic.., Shoshanna Walker, 01/27/2002
- Re: Monotheism was: "admittedly syncretistic.., Jonathan D. Safren, 01/28/2002
- RE: Monotheism was: "admittedly syncretistic.., Ken Smith, 01/28/2002
-
RE: Monotheism was: "admittedly syncretistic..,
Lisbeth S. Fried, 01/26/2002
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.