Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

xom-interest - Re: [XOM-interest] LGPL vs. GPL with library exception

xom-interest AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: XOM API for Processing XML with Java

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Wolfgang Hoschek <whoschek AT lbl.gov>
  • To: Robert Koberg <rob AT koberg.com>
  • Cc: xom-interest AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [XOM-interest] LGPL vs. GPL with library exception
  • Date: Sun, 6 Feb 2005 14:09:32 -0800

On Feb 6, 2005, at 1:25 PM, Robert Koberg wrote:

Paul King wrote:
A move to apache would typically be welcomed by most commercial companies.
The feedback I have (mosty from Australia) on "GPL with library exception"
vs LGPL is that the jury is still out as to which is "safer" for commercial
offerings wanting to bundle xom. Of course you can always dual license it.

Yep... I have talked to a few CEOs of medium sized companies and VP/Directors for large companies. Mostly they just roll their eyes when open source software comes up. It is easy to explain the Apache style license. The (L)GPL style license is always qualified with, "but... you should have your lawyers check it out..." Guess what their response is...


I can confirm this.

Plus, for a software such as XOM that's primarily targetting ease of use with a shallow learning curve, it's not really helpful to have the legal department check licensing conditions and get a response some months later... "Get started today and have something working tomorrow" is a rather typical IT case. Might as well work with something else that get's the job done faster and safer (in the legal sense). The license is part of the usability puzzle and Apache style would help here...

Wolfgang.





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page