sm-sorcery AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Discussion of Sorcery related topics
List archive
- From: Paul <dufflebunk AT dufflebunk.homeip.net>
- To: sm-sorcery <sm-sorcery AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [SM-Sorcery] Sorcery quality assurance
- Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 22:28:25 -0500
What meeting? A team would be good. I'm low on time, I havne't had much
time for sorcery bugs even lately.
On Tue, 2004-01-27 at 22:16, Andrew wrote:
> I was just thinking that a special qa grimoire ought to be made for
> this. Why don't we come up with a small team to get together and make
> this fly at the meeting.
>
> -Andrew
>
> On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 10:14:51PM -0500, Paul wrote:
> > Well, a grimoire with spells designed to test various situations would
> > probably be needed... lets see...
> >
> > - If not A nor B are installed, and A depends on B, and A is cast, B is
> > cast as well.
> >
> > - As above but with A needing B and B needing C. Casting A would cast A,
> > b, and C.
> >
> > - A spell that has an addition to /etc/services adds it when cast and
> > removes it when dispelled. And doesn't toast the rest of the file.
> >
> > - As above for xinetd and init.d
> >
> > - After casting anything, the state/depends, state/packages, and
> > activity log are not doasted and the packages and activity log have the
> > correct additions
> >
> > There's a start. There are a lot of other things that should be added
> > though.
> >
> > On Tue, 2004-01-27 at 21:51, Andrew wrote:
> > > > Unless there is a checklist that must be run through before a stable
> > > > p4
> > > > gets published, I don't think it'll help much. Or unit testing, but
> > > > unit
> > > > testing isn't going to happen. Some test could be automated in a
> > > > similar
> > > > way as prometheus... that would be quite an undertaking though.
> > > >
> > > come up with some test cases, and the expected behavior and I'll
> > > automate
> > > something to test for regressions.
> > >
> > > -Andrew
> > --
> > De mortuis nihil nisi bonum.
> >
>
>
>
> > _______________________________________________
> > SM-Sorcery mailing list
> > SM-Sorcery AT lists.ibiblio.org
> > http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-sorcery
--
De mortuis nihil nisi bonum.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-
[SM-Sorcery] Sorcery quality assurance,
Eric Sandall, 01/27/2004
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery] Sorcery quality assurance,
Andrew, 01/27/2004
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery] Sorcery quality assurance,
Eric Sandall, 01/28/2004
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery] Sorcery quality assurance,
Jason Flatt, 01/28/2004
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery] Sorcery quality assurance,
Ondra Tomecka, 01/28/2004
- Re: [SM-Sorcery] Sorcery quality assurance, Eric Schabell, 01/28/2004
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery] Sorcery quality assurance,
Ondra Tomecka, 01/28/2004
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery] Sorcery quality assurance,
Jason Flatt, 01/28/2004
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery] Sorcery quality assurance,
Eric Sandall, 01/28/2004
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery] Sorcery quality assurance,
Paul, 01/27/2004
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery] Sorcery quality assurance,
Andrew, 01/27/2004
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery] Sorcery quality assurance,
Paul, 01/27/2004
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery] Sorcery quality assurance,
Andrew, 01/27/2004
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery] Sorcery quality assurance,
Paul, 01/27/2004
- Re: [SM-Sorcery] Sorcery quality assurance, Andrew, 01/27/2004
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery] Sorcery quality assurance,
Paul, 01/27/2004
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery] Sorcery quality assurance,
Andrew, 01/27/2004
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery] Sorcery quality assurance,
Paul, 01/27/2004
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery] Sorcery quality assurance,
Andrew, 01/27/2004
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery] Sorcery quality assurance,
Eric Schabell, 01/28/2004
- Re: [SM-Sorcery] Sorcery quality assurance, Eric Sandall, 01/28/2004
- Re: [SM-Sorcery] Sorcery quality assurance, Hamish Greig, 01/28/2004
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
-
RE: Re: [SM-Sorcery] Sorcery quality assurance,
evraire, 01/28/2004
- [SM-Sorcery] Helping out in Sorcery?, Eric Schabell, 01/29/2004
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery] Sorcery quality assurance,
Andrew, 01/27/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.