sm-sorcery AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Discussion of Sorcery related topics
List archive
- From: Eric Sandall <eric AT sandall.us>
- To: sm-sorcery AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Sorcery] Sorcery quality assurance
- Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 00:43:02 -0800
Quoting Andrew <afrayedknot AT thefrayedknot.armory.com>:
> just some random musings:
> I like the idea of a test sorcery as a staging area for stable
> releases. Also, I think that maybe we should have the concept of a bug
> reviewer, someone else on the team that has to review the change and
> make sure that the fix works and doesn't break anything, the reviewer
> can be choosen at random from other sorcery team members. Then when
> the reviewer thinks that the fix is good, doesn't break anything, and
> has tested it reasonably, it can be pushed down to the test release.
Sounds like what the person fixing the bug should do anyways. ;) However, a
second set of eyes would be good as well. Any volunteers (even one not from
the
Sorcery Team)?
> Also we seem to have this situation where we mark bugs as 'fixed' and
> then they sit around waiting to be verified and closed. Maybe we ought to
> specify the protocol a little better. Where I work the reporter is the
> one to mark the bug as closed when they decide that the bug is actually
> fixed to their satisfaction, otherwise they reopen it.
I thought that was SOP anyways, but I guess we don't have it documented
explicitly. Do we have a "HOWTO write bugs"?
-sandalle
--
PGP Key Fingerprint: FCFF 26A1 BE21 08F4 BB91 FAED 1D7B 7D74 A8EF DD61
http://search.keyserver.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xA8EFDD61
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.12
GCS/E/IT$ d-- s++:+>: a-- C++(+++) BL++++VIS>$ P+(++) L+++ E-(---) W++ N+@ o?
K? w++++>-- O M-@ V-- PS+(+++) PE(-) Y++(+) PGP++(+) t+() 5++ X(+) R+(++)
tv(--)b++(+++) DI+@ D++(+++) G>+++ e>+++ h---(++) r++ y+
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
Eric Sandall | Source Mage GNU/Linux Developer
eric AT sandall.us | http://www.sourcemage.org/
http://eric.sandall.us/ | SysAdmin @ Inst. Shock Physics @ WSU
http://counter.li.org/ #196285 | http://www.shock.wsu.edu/
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
-
[SM-Sorcery] Sorcery quality assurance,
Eric Sandall, 01/27/2004
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery] Sorcery quality assurance,
Andrew, 01/27/2004
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery] Sorcery quality assurance,
Eric Sandall, 01/28/2004
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery] Sorcery quality assurance,
Jason Flatt, 01/28/2004
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery] Sorcery quality assurance,
Ondra Tomecka, 01/28/2004
- Re: [SM-Sorcery] Sorcery quality assurance, Eric Schabell, 01/28/2004
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery] Sorcery quality assurance,
Ondra Tomecka, 01/28/2004
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery] Sorcery quality assurance,
Jason Flatt, 01/28/2004
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery] Sorcery quality assurance,
Eric Sandall, 01/28/2004
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery] Sorcery quality assurance,
Paul, 01/27/2004
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery] Sorcery quality assurance,
Andrew, 01/27/2004
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery] Sorcery quality assurance,
Paul, 01/27/2004
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery] Sorcery quality assurance,
Andrew, 01/27/2004
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery] Sorcery quality assurance,
Paul, 01/27/2004
- Re: [SM-Sorcery] Sorcery quality assurance, Andrew, 01/27/2004
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery] Sorcery quality assurance,
Paul, 01/27/2004
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery] Sorcery quality assurance,
Andrew, 01/27/2004
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery] Sorcery quality assurance,
Paul, 01/27/2004
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery] Sorcery quality assurance,
Andrew, 01/27/2004
- Re: [SM-Sorcery] Sorcery quality assurance, Eric Schabell, 01/28/2004
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery] Sorcery quality assurance,
Andrew, 01/27/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.