Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sm-grimoire - Re: [SM-Grimoire] Smaller devel grimoire

sm-grimoire AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Discussion of Spells and Grimoire items

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Hamish Greig <hgreig AT bigpond.net.au>
  • To: Grimoire <sm-grimoire AT lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: Re: [SM-Grimoire] Smaller devel grimoire
  • Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2003 00:16:56 +1000

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Wed, 17 Sep 2003 21:29, Tony Smith wrote:
> Nice idea, but it's going to make things very difficult to manage...
>
> What happens when the devel version is integrated into test? Are you
> proposing to delete it from devel? If so you're about to cause a lot of
> hassle for the test/stable maintainers.
Two quick questions Tony
1) if a spell is added in devel, worked on, then /integrated/ to test, then
the devel version is deleted won't the test version keep all the previous
revision history ?
2) For spells already in test that we have copied into devel to rewrite/
whatever can't we just use p4 edit and then copy the files back into test
when we are ready ? the files get updated to the newer version but keep all
previous revision history (from test) ? Or not ? The history from the
rewrite is of little concern to me as i would like to see more ### commenting
in the spells and more descriptive HISTORY entries.
If these two points are good then devel would truly be just a "branch" of
test
for work in progress ( like someone mentioned last week)
maybe a quick third point :)
If cvs syncing will trample all over our revision history anyway, why go out
of our way to save it just to lose it later ?
Hamish
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/aGze8fSufZR6424RAminAJ4samFBtraEkJ5DyOXZHfVKh660rwCeII5N
SWFrojjvsP275ka0qzUqaUM=
=KHKP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page