Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sm-grimoire - Re: [SM-Grimoire] Smaller devel grimoire

sm-grimoire AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Discussion of Spells and Grimoire items

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Hamish Greig <hgreig AT bigpond.net.au>
  • To: sm-grimoire AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [SM-Grimoire] Smaller devel grimoire
  • Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2003 13:35:23 +1000

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Wed, 17 Sep 2003 03:00, Eric Sandall wrote:
> Sorry, I completely forgot about that. :( So, we've had a few replies,
> lets get some more. This sounds like it would be a good step in
> simplifying our grimoire structure, so I'd like to get this going within a
> few weeks, if possible.
>
> Would we leave all of the section directories there if they are empty, or
> remove them? I'd say leave the shell there (without MAINTAINER files) so
> that we have a skeletal structure for placing packages.
>
> -sandalle
I think leaving almost-empty dirs with only MAINTAINER files is a good idea.
I
think perforce doesn't like empty dirs it uses files as a reaon for a dir to
exist.
But seriously i would like to see a quick poll on this so later we don't have
to debate it over and over.
It is physically draining to butt my head against a brickwall over and over
again like i have been lately.
Hamish
- --
IRC nick: drmoriarty
One of three conspirators in the SMGL hijacking.
#Do You SMGL!?
# Linux so advanced it may as well be magic!
# http://www.sourcemage.org/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/Z9bA8fSufZR6424RAqGEAKCGNid43eYKmh3b/P9eX2qfAlBW+wCfcQ7z
bImOGwNfLmsfiIB8rGoe7Jw=
=+por
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page