sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
Re: [SM-Discuss] Anyone interested in a mlocate spell?
- From: Robert Figura <rfigura AT aubergine.zwischengesicht.de>
- To: seth AT swoolley.homeip.net
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Anyone interested in a mlocate spell?
- Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 19:14:07 +0100
- Resent-date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 22:37:19 +0100
- Resent-from: Robert Figura <rfigura AT aubergine.zwischengesicht.de>
- Resent-to: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
seth AT swoolley.homeip.net wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 07:36:04AM +0000, Ethan Grammatikidis wrote:
> > It may be complicated, but the locate bundled with findutils is not
> > appropriate for some systems. It shows the existence of files that a
> > user should not ordinarily be able to see. Mlocate, being derived from
> > slocate (secure locate), doesn't have this issue. Also I remember
> > findutils locate being noticably slower at searching the database than
> > slocate, but I may be going back to when findutils depended on perl.
>
> So you've identified a possible security issue. Keep this in mind.
It's only a security issue if you decide to use updatedb ;^)
Not sure wether we should warn inexperienced admins... maybe yes...
I may not grok this correctly but removing the locate binary install
merely seems to be something to make it compatible with mlocate.
Just my 2c,
Regards
Robert Figura
--
/* mandlsig.c 0.42 (c) by Robert Figura */
I=1702;float O,o,i;main(l){for(;I--;putchar("oO .,\nt>neo.ckgel-t\
agidif@<ra urig FrtbeRo"[I%74?I>837&874>I?I^833:l%5:5]))for(O=o=l=
0;O*O+o*o<(16^l++);o=2*O*o+I/74/11.-1,O=i)i=O*O-o*o+I%74*.04-2.2;}
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Anyone interested in a mlocate spell?,
Ethan Grammatikidis, 11/11/2008
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Anyone interested in a mlocate spell?,
seth, 11/11/2008
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Anyone interested in a mlocate spell?, Robert Figura, 11/11/2008
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Anyone interested in a mlocate spell?,
Kevin Monceaux, 11/11/2008
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Anyone interested in a mlocate spell?,
flux, 11/11/2008
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Anyone interested in a mlocate spell?,
seth, 11/11/2008
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Anyone interested in a mlocate spell?,
Kevin Monceaux, 11/11/2008
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Anyone interested in a mlocate spell?,
seth, 11/11/2008
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Anyone interested in a mlocate spell?,
Jeremy Blosser, 11/11/2008
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Anyone interested in a mlocate spell?, Jeremy Blosser, 11/11/2008
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Anyone interested in a mlocate spell?, Kevin Monceaux, 11/11/2008
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Anyone interested in a mlocate spell?, Eric Sandall, 11/17/2008
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Anyone interested in a mlocate spell?,
Jeremy Blosser, 11/11/2008
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Anyone interested in a mlocate spell?, Eric Sandall, 11/17/2008
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Anyone interested in a mlocate spell?,
seth, 11/11/2008
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Anyone interested in a mlocate spell?,
Kevin Monceaux, 11/11/2008
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Anyone interested in a mlocate spell?,
seth, 11/11/2008
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Anyone interested in a mlocate spell?,
flux, 11/11/2008
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Anyone interested in a mlocate spell?,
seth, 11/11/2008
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.