sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
Re: [SM-Discuss] RFC: sorcery usabilty study results
- From: eekee57 AT fastmail.fm
- To: smgl AT lynxlynx.info
- Cc: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] RFC: sorcery usabilty study results
- Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 20:43:11 +0100 (BST)
On 3 Apr, Jaka Kranjc wrote:
> On Thursday 03 of April 2008 00:37:44 eekee57 AT fastmail.fm wrote:
>> On 2 Apr, "Andraž 'ruskie' Levstik" wrote:
>> > I belive the term is April Fools ;)
>>
>> Got me too! I think my brain almost turned a somersault when I saw that
>> Jaka originated these brain-warping suggestions. I wonder if S. A.
>> stands for anything? sq, ri, and co are the only commands I don't
> S. A. - would I use just the initials if the person wanted to share the
> name?
>
> S. A. stands for Sorbus aria! :D
LOL tree :D
>
>> recognize, although I had to look up sg to be sure. Are they provided by
>> any packages, or were they just put in to throw us off the trail?
> All items on both lists are commands. co is from rcs, sq from ispell and
> squirrel.
>
> LP
>
ahh ok ^_^'
--
Ethan Grammatikidis
16:32:10 <+flux_control> git blame "struct filled with hex" && shoot_on_sight
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] RFC: sorcery usabilty study results
, (continued)
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] RFC: sorcery usabilty study results,
sqweek, 04/01/2008
- Re: [SM-Discuss] RFC: sorcery usabilty study results, Ismael Luceno, 04/01/2008
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] RFC: sorcery usabilty study results,
Karsten Behrmann, 04/01/2008
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] RFC: sorcery usabilty study results,
David Kowis, 04/01/2008
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] RFC: sorcery usabilty study results,
Andraž 'ruskie' Levstik, 04/02/2008
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] RFC: sorcery usabilty study results,
Thomas Orgis, 04/02/2008
- Re: [SM-Discuss] RFC: sorcery usabilty study results, Robert Figura, 04/02/2008
- Re: [SM-Discuss] RFC: sorcery usabilty study results, David Kowis, 04/02/2008
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] RFC: sorcery usabilty study results,
eekee57, 04/02/2008
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] RFC: sorcery usabilty study results,
Jaka Kranjc, 04/02/2008
- Re: [SM-Discuss] RFC: sorcery usabilty study results, eekee57, 04/04/2008
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] RFC: sorcery usabilty study results,
Jaka Kranjc, 04/02/2008
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] RFC: sorcery usabilty study results,
Thomas Orgis, 04/02/2008
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] RFC: sorcery usabilty study results,
Andraž 'ruskie' Levstik, 04/02/2008
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] RFC: sorcery usabilty study results,
David Kowis, 04/01/2008
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] RFC: sorcery usabilty study results,
sqweek, 04/01/2008
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.