sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
Re: [SM-Discuss] RFC: sorcery usabilty study results
- From: Karsten Behrmann <BearPerson AT gmx.net>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] RFC: sorcery usabilty study results
- Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 18:21:03 +0200
> So here is the sorted initial list of the shortcuts and what they woud run:
> cc - cast --queue (who can spell queue anyway?)
> cp - cleanse --prune
> dd - dispel --downgrade
> gs - gaze search
> gv - gaze version
> sg - sorcery upgrade
> sh - sorcery hold
> sq - sorcery -q
> su - scribe update
Good idea, but that list desperately needs adding to.
ac - alter --md5mend ("Checksum" is far more futureproof than md5)
as - alter --strip
at - gaze activity
cd - cast --download
co - cast -c ("COmpile")
df - dispel --nosustain (every one knows it's "Force" anyway)
ex - dispel --exile
ls - gaze license
nc - cast -r ("New Config")
pr - gaze provides
ri - scribe reindex
wc - gaze what ("What will this Cast do?")
So Far,
BP
--
Open source is not about suing someone who sells your software. It is
about being able to walk behind him, grinning, and waving free CDs with
the equivalent of what he is trying to sell.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] RFC: sorcery usabilty study results,
Jaka Kranjc, 04/01/2008
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] RFC: sorcery usabilty study results,
sqweek, 04/01/2008
- Re: [SM-Discuss] RFC: sorcery usabilty study results, Ismael Luceno, 04/01/2008
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] RFC: sorcery usabilty study results,
Karsten Behrmann, 04/01/2008
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] RFC: sorcery usabilty study results,
David Kowis, 04/01/2008
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] RFC: sorcery usabilty study results,
Andraž 'ruskie' Levstik, 04/02/2008
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] RFC: sorcery usabilty study results,
Thomas Orgis, 04/02/2008
- Re: [SM-Discuss] RFC: sorcery usabilty study results, Robert Figura, 04/02/2008
- Re: [SM-Discuss] RFC: sorcery usabilty study results, David Kowis, 04/02/2008
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] RFC: sorcery usabilty study results,
eekee57, 04/02/2008
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] RFC: sorcery usabilty study results,
Jaka Kranjc, 04/02/2008
- Re: [SM-Discuss] RFC: sorcery usabilty study results, eekee57, 04/04/2008
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] RFC: sorcery usabilty study results,
Jaka Kranjc, 04/02/2008
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] RFC: sorcery usabilty study results,
Thomas Orgis, 04/02/2008
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] RFC: sorcery usabilty study results,
Andraž 'ruskie' Levstik, 04/02/2008
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] RFC: sorcery usabilty study results,
David Kowis, 04/01/2008
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.