sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List

List archive

Re: [SM-Discuss] RFC: sorcery usabilty study results

From: Thomas Orgis <thomas-forum AT orgis.org>
To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] RFC: sorcery usabilty study results
Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2008 12:03:11 +0200

Am Wed, 02 Apr 2008 07:15:09 +0200
schrieb "Andraž 'ruskie' Levstik" <ruskie AT codemages.net>:

> I belive the term is April Fools ;)

And I'm amazed on how well it worked... congrats, Jaka!

Alrighty then,

Thomas.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Re: [SM-Discuss] RFC: sorcery usabilty study results, Jaka Kranjc, 04/01/2008
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: [SM-Discuss] RFC: sorcery usabilty study results, sqweek, 04/01/2008
  - Re: [SM-Discuss] RFC: sorcery usabilty study results, Ismael Luceno, 04/01/2008
- Re: [SM-Discuss] RFC: sorcery usabilty study results, Karsten Behrmann, 04/01/2008
  - Re: [SM-Discuss] RFC: sorcery usabilty study results, David Kowis, 04/01/2008
    - Re: [SM-Discuss] RFC: sorcery usabilty study results, Andraž 'ruskie' Levstik, 04/02/2008
      - Re: [SM-Discuss] RFC: sorcery usabilty study results, Thomas Orgis, 04/02/2008
        
        Re: [SM-Discuss] RFC: sorcery usabilty study results, Robert Figura, 04/02/2008
      - Re: [SM-Discuss] RFC: sorcery usabilty study results, David Kowis, 04/02/2008
      - Re: [SM-Discuss] RFC: sorcery usabilty study results, eekee57, 04/02/2008
        
        Re: [SM-Discuss] RFC: sorcery usabilty study results, Jaka Kranjc, 04/02/2008
        
        Re: [SM-Discuss] RFC: sorcery usabilty study results, eekee57, 04/04/2008