sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List

List archive

Re: [SM-Discuss] RFC: sorcery usabilty study results

From: eekee57 AT fastmail.fm
To: ruskie AT codemages.net
Cc: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] RFC: sorcery usabilty study results
Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2008 23:37:44 +0100 (BST)

On 2 Apr, "Andraž 'ruskie' Levstik" wrote:
> I belive the term is April Fools ;)

Got me too! I think my brain almost turned a somersault when I saw that
Jaka originated these brain-warping suggestions. I wonder if S. A.
stands for anything? sq, ri, and co are the only commands I don't
recognize, although I had to look up sg to be sure. Are they provided by
any packages, or were they just put in to throw us off the trail?

--
Ethan Grammatikidis

16:32:10 <+flux_control> git blame "struct filled with hex" && shoot_on_sight

Re: [SM-Discuss] RFC: sorcery usabilty study results, Jaka Kranjc, 04/01/2008
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: [SM-Discuss] RFC: sorcery usabilty study results, sqweek, 04/01/2008
  - Re: [SM-Discuss] RFC: sorcery usabilty study results, Ismael Luceno, 04/01/2008
- Re: [SM-Discuss] RFC: sorcery usabilty study results, Karsten Behrmann, 04/01/2008
  - Re: [SM-Discuss] RFC: sorcery usabilty study results, David Kowis, 04/01/2008
    - Re: [SM-Discuss] RFC: sorcery usabilty study results, Andraž 'ruskie' Levstik, 04/02/2008
      - Re: [SM-Discuss] RFC: sorcery usabilty study results, Thomas Orgis, 04/02/2008
        
        Re: [SM-Discuss] RFC: sorcery usabilty study results, Robert Figura, 04/02/2008
      - Re: [SM-Discuss] RFC: sorcery usabilty study results, David Kowis, 04/02/2008
      - Re: [SM-Discuss] RFC: sorcery usabilty study results, eekee57, 04/02/2008
        
        Re: [SM-Discuss] RFC: sorcery usabilty study results, Jaka Kranjc, 04/02/2008
        
        Re: [SM-Discuss] RFC: sorcery usabilty study results, eekee57, 04/04/2008