sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List

List archive

Re: [SM-Discuss] RFC: sorcery usabilty study results

From: Robert Figura <rfigura AT aubergine.zwischengesicht.de>
To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] RFC: sorcery usabilty study results
Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2008 15:40:57 +0200

Thomas Orgis <thomas-forum AT orgis.org> schrieb:
> schrieb "Andraž 'ruskie' Levstik" <ruskie AT codemages.net>:
>
> > I belive the term is April Fools ;)
>
> And I'm amazed on how well it worked... congrats, Jaka!

you got me wondering, too...

:)

- Robert Figura

--
I=1702;float O,o,i;main(l){for(;I--;putchar("oO .,m>cot.bitamea\
@urigrf <raguFit erobR"[I%74?I>837&874>I?I^833:l%5:5]))for(O=o=l=
0;O*O+o*o<(16^l++);o=2*O*o+I/74/11.-1,O=i)i=O*O-o*o+I%74*.04-2.2;}

Attachment: pgpee0BH01Bk_.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Re: [SM-Discuss] RFC: sorcery usabilty study results, Jaka Kranjc, 04/01/2008
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: [SM-Discuss] RFC: sorcery usabilty study results, sqweek, 04/01/2008
  - Re: [SM-Discuss] RFC: sorcery usabilty study results, Ismael Luceno, 04/01/2008
- Re: [SM-Discuss] RFC: sorcery usabilty study results, Karsten Behrmann, 04/01/2008
  - Re: [SM-Discuss] RFC: sorcery usabilty study results, David Kowis, 04/01/2008
    - Re: [SM-Discuss] RFC: sorcery usabilty study results, Andraž 'ruskie' Levstik, 04/02/2008
      - Re: [SM-Discuss] RFC: sorcery usabilty study results, Thomas Orgis, 04/02/2008
        
        Re: [SM-Discuss] RFC: sorcery usabilty study results, Robert Figura, 04/02/2008
      - Re: [SM-Discuss] RFC: sorcery usabilty study results, David Kowis, 04/02/2008
      - Re: [SM-Discuss] RFC: sorcery usabilty study results, eekee57, 04/02/2008
        
        Re: [SM-Discuss] RFC: sorcery usabilty study results, Jaka Kranjc, 04/02/2008
        
        Re: [SM-Discuss] RFC: sorcery usabilty study results, eekee57, 04/04/2008