sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Eric Sandall <eric AT sandall.us>
- To: SM-Discuss <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Let's make Source Mage not suck!
- Date: Fri, 05 Jan 2007 13:54:45 -0800
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Jeremy Blosser wrote:
> On Jan 05, Andrew [afrayedknot AT thefrayedknot.armory.com] wrote:
>> Another idea I just had is that maybe the organizer of the release should
>> rotate amongst the leads. The organizers role being to make sure things
>> get done. They dont for example have to actually create/sign/upload
>> the tarballs, but they should make sure that it happens in a timely
>> manner. I'll do this one of course. I think there are advantages in
>> rotating the responsibility, more people know directly how things ought to
>> work, no one gets burned out, and its in the spirit of the "lead-team"
>> idea.
>
> I've had this thought as well but was going to watch how this one went a
> bit before suggesting it. Other distros use this approach to their
> advantage; coordinating releases can be a big deal and it seems to help to
> let people take turns, both to avoid burnout and to avoid just one person
> knowing all the details of how it has to happen.
All hail the current Stable Pumpkin Holder! ;)
I think rotation is a good idea, and will hopefully give other Leads
(once they're in the "seat") have an idea of what the process fully entails.
- -sandalle
- --
Eric Sandall | Source Mage GNU/Linux Developer
eric at sandall.us PGP: 0xA8EFDD61 | http://www.sourcemage.org/
http://eric.sandall.us/ | http://counter.li.org/ #196285
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFFnsklHXt9dKjv3WERClBkAJ9qsawJAkg3iPcLn0D3DcaA2JVf4ACfWzJm
0s/XaNpOTerpQpGYLwsQuug=
=Zb56
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Let's make Source Mage not suck!
, (continued)
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Let's make Source Mage not suck!, Andrew, 01/04/2007
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Let's make Source Mage not suck!, Eric Sandall, 01/04/2007
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Let's make Source Mage not suck!, Andrew, 01/05/2007
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Let's make Source Mage not suck!, Juuso Alasuutari, 01/05/2007
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Let's make Source Mage not suck!, Mathieu L., 01/05/2007
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Let's make Source Mage not suck!, Thomas Orgis, 01/05/2007
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Let's make Source Mage not suck!, Juuso Alasuutari, 01/05/2007
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Let's make Source Mage not suck!, Jaka Kranjc, 01/05/2007
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Let's make Source Mage not suck!, Andrew, 01/05/2007
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Let's make Source Mage not suck!, Jeremy Blosser, 01/05/2007
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Let's make Source Mage not suck!, Eric Sandall, 01/05/2007
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Let's make Source Mage not suck!, Eric Sandall, 01/05/2007
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Let's make Source Mage not suck!, Jaka Kranjc, 01/05/2007
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Let's make Source Mage not suck!, Juuso Alasuutari, 01/05/2007
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Let's make Source Mage not suck!, Eric Sandall, 01/07/2007
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Let's make Source Mage not suck!, Andrew Stitt, 01/05/2007
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Let's make Source Mage not suck!, Eric Sandall, 01/07/2007
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Let's make Source Mage not suck!, Alexander Tsamutali, 01/07/2007
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Let's make Source Mage not suck!, Andraž 'ruskie' Levstik, 01/07/2007
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Let's make Source Mage not suck!, seth, 01/07/2007
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Let's make Source Mage not suck!, Andraž 'ruskie' Levstik, 01/07/2007
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.