sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: "Andraž 'ruskie' Levstik" <ruskie AT mages.ath.cx>
- To: <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Status of gcc 4.1
- Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 00:04:37 +0100
On 23:49:32 2006-12-20 Eric Sandall <eric AT sandall.us> wrote:
>
> Which Prometheus is perfect for. After testing a spell it'll revert the
> system back to how it was before that spell was cast. The version bump
> testing is also important as features may change on a version bump, but
> the developer most likely has not tested every combination of optional
> dependencies and config_queries against the new version. Yes, we would
> still need donations of boxes capable of providing this.
>
Well I've got linux-vserver setup on most of my boxes and since it takes
neglible amount of resources to run it until it's acctually doing something
I would volunteer for something like this...
Just need to define what the testing chroot ought to be:
i.e. flags, optimisations possibly other stuff...
Or at the very least have a list of combinations that would be tested for
each host so that there isn't more than one box running the same set of
flags, optimisations etc...
--
Andraž "ruskie" Levstik
Source Mage GNU/Linux Games grimoire guru
Geek/Hacker/Tinker
Hacker FAQ: http://www.plethora.net/%7eseebs/faqs/hacker.html
Be sure brain is in gear before engaging mouth.
Key id = A7A9E461
Key fingerprint = 757E C16B F5B7 DC27 B003 CCED CF95 3A77 A7A9 E461
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Status of gcc 4.1
, (continued)
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Status of gcc 4.1, Ladislav Hagara, 12/11/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Status of gcc 4.1, Andrew Stitt, 12/11/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Status of gcc 4.1, Daniel Goller, 12/11/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Status of gcc 4.1, Andrew Stitt, 12/18/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Status of gcc 4.1, Ladislav Hagara, 12/18/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Status of gcc 4.1, Andrew Stitt, 12/18/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Status of gcc 4.1, Eric Sandall, 12/20/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Status of gcc 4.1, Juuso Alasuutari, 12/20/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Status of gcc 4.1, David Kowis, 12/20/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Status of gcc 4.1, Eric Sandall, 12/20/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Status of gcc 4.1, Andraž 'ruskie' Levstik, 12/20/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Status of gcc 4.1,
Flavien Bridault, 12/05/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Status of gcc 4.1, Robin Cook, 12/05/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Status of gcc 4.1, Jaka Kranjc, 12/11/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.