sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Jaka Kranjc <lynx AT mages.ath.cx>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Status of gcc 4.1
- Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 16:06:10 +0100
On Friday 08 December 2006 16:32, Jaka Kranjc wrote:
> I have updated gcc, g++ and fortran locally, but currently only gcc has
> been tested. I will push it once everything casts and some other random
> stuff casts too.
>
> I don't use the rest of the "suite", so someone else will have to take care
> of that.
>
> A more important question: are 4.0 and 4.1 binary compatible? gcc
> purposefully triggers a recast of just the compiler comrades, nothing more
> (here).
My system rebooted just fine, things work and casts of various other spells
went well too. So it doesn't appear that 4.0 and 4.1 are incompatible (didn't
find any other proof either).
All the spells have been updated and pushed, right about now.
--
We cannot command nature except by obeying her. --Sir Francis Bacon
Have a sourcerous day! www.sourcemage.org
Attachment:
pgprlJX5zKjB2.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Status of gcc 4.1
, (continued)
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Status of gcc 4.1, Eric Sandall, 12/20/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Status of gcc 4.1, Juuso Alasuutari, 12/20/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Status of gcc 4.1, David Kowis, 12/20/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Status of gcc 4.1, Eric Sandall, 12/20/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Status of gcc 4.1, Andraž 'ruskie' Levstik, 12/20/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Status of gcc 4.1,
Flavien Bridault, 12/05/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Status of gcc 4.1, Robin Cook, 12/05/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Status of gcc 4.1, Jaka Kranjc, 12/11/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.