sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Arwed von Merkatz <v.merkatz AT gmx.net>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Status of gcc 4.1
- Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2006 20:10:43 +0100
On Tue, Dec 05, 2006 at 07:49:13PM +0100, Jaka Kranjc wrote:
> On Tuesday 05 December 2006 20:28, Flavien Bridault wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > What is the status of gcc 4.1. I've used it for months and imho it could
> > go in test. What does actually prevent it to go there ?
> Does the majority of packages (not already using GCC_VERSION) build with
> it?
> I'd expect it to be even stricter about code than before ... A good test
> would be a succesful sorcery rebuild.
Well, if you want me to do a sorcery rebuild, we'll still use gcc 4.0
when 5.0 gets released ;)
But even though my machine is slow, I have probably rebuilt 90 - 100% of
the 450 spells installed here, and can say that 4.1 works for me.
Does anyone know of gcc 4.1 caused breakage in some
important/"mainstream" spell?
--
Arwed v. Merkatz Source Mage GNU/Linux developer
http://www.sourcemage.org
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Status of gcc 4.1
, (continued)
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Status of gcc 4.1, Andrew Stitt, 12/11/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Status of gcc 4.1, Daniel Goller, 12/11/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Status of gcc 4.1, Andrew Stitt, 12/18/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Status of gcc 4.1, Ladislav Hagara, 12/18/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Status of gcc 4.1, Andrew Stitt, 12/18/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Status of gcc 4.1, Eric Sandall, 12/20/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Status of gcc 4.1, Juuso Alasuutari, 12/20/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Status of gcc 4.1, David Kowis, 12/20/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Status of gcc 4.1, Eric Sandall, 12/20/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Status of gcc 4.1, Andraž 'ruskie' Levstik, 12/20/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Status of gcc 4.1,
Flavien Bridault, 12/05/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Status of gcc 4.1, Robin Cook, 12/05/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Status of gcc 4.1, Jaka Kranjc, 12/11/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.