sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: David Kowis <dkowis AT shlrm.org>
- To: Juuso Alasuutari <iuso AT sourcemage.org>
- Cc: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Status of gcc 4.1
- Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 15:39:29 -0600
Juuso Alasuutari wrote:
> On Wednesday 20 December 2006 21:26, Eric Sandall wrote:
> <snip>
>> We could have a box (or boxes) dedicated to running prometheus on all
>> git commits against each spell modified. This, I think, would be a
>> better approach than modifying Sorcery to do so (IMO Sorcery is the
>> wrong tool for bug testing).
>
> I really like this idea. We talked about something like this with Arwed
> when
> he visited Finland a few months ago. Instant feedback from Prometheus would
> help harden our spells, as long as it wouldn't be used as an easy way to
> avoid pre-commit testing (a valid concern).
>
Most git commits are version bumps, which developers should be testing
anyway. So I'm not entirely sure how this would help. What would help
more is a dedicated machine, or vm, with a fresh install on it, so when
the spell is tested, it's against a clean install. This would ensure
that the same environment is used for all testing. Even a chroot would
probably work.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Status of gcc 4.1
, (continued)
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Status of gcc 4.1, Ladislav Hagara, 12/10/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Status of gcc 4.1, seth, 12/10/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Status of gcc 4.1, Ladislav Hagara, 12/11/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Status of gcc 4.1, Andrew Stitt, 12/11/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Status of gcc 4.1, Daniel Goller, 12/11/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Status of gcc 4.1, Andrew Stitt, 12/18/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Status of gcc 4.1, Ladislav Hagara, 12/18/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Status of gcc 4.1, Andrew Stitt, 12/18/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Status of gcc 4.1, Eric Sandall, 12/20/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Status of gcc 4.1, Juuso Alasuutari, 12/20/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Status of gcc 4.1, David Kowis, 12/20/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Status of gcc 4.1, Eric Sandall, 12/20/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Status of gcc 4.1, Andraž 'ruskie' Levstik, 12/20/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Status of gcc 4.1,
Flavien Bridault, 12/05/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Status of gcc 4.1, Robin Cook, 12/05/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Status of gcc 4.1, Jaka Kranjc, 12/11/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.