Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sm-discuss - Re: [SM-Discuss] Status of gcc 4.1

sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Flavien Bridault <vlaaad AT sourcemage.org>
  • To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Status of gcc 4.1
  • Date: Sat, 09 Dec 2006 20:02:52 +0100

Le samedi 09 décembre 2006 à 19:56 +0100, Pieter Lenaerts a écrit :
> Op zaterdag 09-12-2006 om 08:25 uur [tijdzone -0600], schreef Daniel
> Goller:
> > Well, considering how often we force gcc3.4 we should not be too proud of
> > being able to use gcc4.1.
> > For what it's worth, what hasn't been forced does play fine with gcc4.1,
> > and has done so for months.
> > Have nothing to say to glibc2.5, since i haven't touched it.
> >
> > We could either remove all the forcing of gcc3.4 first, and then
> > determine which needs 4.1 patches, or test things against 4.0 and 4.1 at
> > the time we do remove the forcing.
> > There is nothing wrong with 4.1, some code does trigger a few extra
> > sloppyness indicators that even 4.0 still let's fly, but it's not a lot.
> >
> > To make things smoother in the future the forcing of gcc version below
> > what is in test must be discouraged, things do not get fixed that way.
> > This way a rebuild working actually has meaning.
> >
> > We should move forward with gcc/glibc, and encourage to have the gcc3.4
> > forcing removed next time people touch a spell that does it. (After
> > testing it of course.)

This anyway what spell maintainers are supposed to do since the
beginning, right ??

> > Upstream might long have fixed what caused the gcc3.4 forcing. If not we
> > find what other distros might long have in place for that package.
>
> I don't agree at all.
>
> It's not our job to fix up code to be ${GCC_VERSION} compatible. gcc34
> forcing is perfectly normal iyam.
>
> when gcc 4.1 came in the picture, the question was more if we would need
> gcc 4.0 forcing as well as gcc 3.4 forcing.
>
> maybe we took too long to conclude that gcc4.1 does not pose any major
> problems, but all in all things went far more smoothly with this gcc
> update.
>
> _______________________________________________
> SM-Discuss mailing list
> SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss
--
Flavien Bridault

Disk, Graphics, Graphics-libs sections Guru
Source Mage GNU/Linux - http://www.sourcemage.org

irc: vlaaad
jabber: vlaaad AT amessage.be

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page