sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Jaka Kranjc <lynx AT mages.ath.cx>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Status of gcc 4.1
- Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2006 19:49:13 +0100
On Tuesday 05 December 2006 20:28, Flavien Bridault wrote:
> Hello,
>
> What is the status of gcc 4.1. I've used it for months and imho it could
> go in test. What does actually prevent it to go there ?
Does the majority of packages (not already using GCC_VERSION) build with it?
I'd expect it to be even stricter about code than before ... A good test
would be a succesful sorcery rebuild.
--
We cannot command nature except by obeying her. --Sir Francis Bacon
Have a sourcerous day! www.sourcemage.org
Attachment:
pgpDhP3AjwECI.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-
[SM-Discuss] Status of gcc 4.1,
Flavien Bridault, 12/05/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Status of gcc 4.1,
Jaka Kranjc, 12/05/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Status of gcc 4.1,
Flavien Bridault, 12/05/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Status of gcc 4.1, Jeremy A. Kolb, 12/05/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Status of gcc 4.1,
Thomas Orgis, 12/05/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Status of gcc 4.1,
Andraž 'ruskie' Levstik, 12/05/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Status of gcc 4.1,
Flavien Bridault, 12/08/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Status of gcc 4.1,
Daniel Goller, 12/09/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Status of gcc 4.1, Pieter Lenaerts, 12/09/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Status of gcc 4.1, Flavien Bridault, 12/09/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Status of gcc 4.1, Daniel Goller, 12/09/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Status of gcc 4.1, Pieter Lenaerts, 12/10/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Status of gcc 4.1,
Daniel Goller, 12/09/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Status of gcc 4.1,
Flavien Bridault, 12/08/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Status of gcc 4.1,
Andraž 'ruskie' Levstik, 12/05/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Status of gcc 4.1,
Flavien Bridault, 12/05/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Status of gcc 4.1,
Jaka Kranjc, 12/05/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.