Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sm-discuss - Re: [SM-Discuss] Grimoire for deprecated spells

sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Matt Donovan <kitche AT reddphoenix.com>
  • To: Matthew Clark <MatthewClark AT InLesserTerms.net>
  • Cc: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Grimoire for deprecated spells
  • Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 18:34:13 -0400

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Matthew Clark wrote:
>
>
> David Kowis wrote:
>> As long as we still fix bugs against the "deprecated" grimoire,
> this is
>> okay. If it's gonna just sit there and rot, then it's not good
> criteria.
>> If we're going to use this for stuff that's just seldomly used,
>> then that's okay. If it's for stuff that's dead or broken, it's
>> not good.
>
> I support the entire idea, as I've come across a few spells which
> could fit into such a grimoire.
I support this idea as well as long as the application isn't
maintained upstream.
>
> I generally agree with the ideas being stated thus far. I think
> only applications which no longer have upstream maintenance, those
> which don't have an upstream source URL anymore, or those for which
> documentation is invalid or no longer available should be placed in
> their own grimoire.
>
> If an application doesn't compile anymore, is too old to be useful,
> and has NO support anywhere (not just upstream), then it should
> then go straight into the removal process to have the spell
> removed; I see no point in keeping spells around that will never
> work. If a spell is in such a state, I wouldn't expect very many
> machines to have it anyway.
I agree with the above. Since what is the use of having applications
that don't compile at all for anyone.
>
> I do fear, however, that spells pushed into this "deprecated"
> grimoire will not be maintained as well as the rest of the spells.
> But then, who will notice? I suppose the criteria for maintaining
> these spells would be at least on an as-needed basis (as in, only
> when a bug is filed). But that's just a thought, not a suggestion.
>
>
>
> - Matt (MaffooClock)
>
>
_______________________________________________
SM-Discuss mailing list
SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFE4Ppk43Yu9vC6OrcRArDmAKCEovXAqNRGJTJYXn83HCJO5TQObQCfZ38Y
KmsoEge3aAymAHZLpMv6J3Q=
=Y6rw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page