sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: David Kowis <dkowis AT shlrm.org>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Grimoire for deprecated spells
- Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 15:52:39 -0500
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Andraž "ruskie" Levstik wrote:
> This would be for spells that:
> a) don't have upstream support(this is basicaly a must)
Okay that's good and defined.
> b) fail to build, relevant to point a
Good criteria too.
> c) bitrotten stuff, relevant to point a
How do we define bitrotten? Doesn't that typically equate to "fails to
build" ?
> d) fail to run properly even if they run, relevant to point a
> e) are simply not used anylonger(I think gnome1 fits in here)
As long as we still fix bugs against the "deprecated" grimoire, this is
okay. If it's gonna just sit there and rot, then it's not good criteria.
If we're going to use this for stuff that's just seldomly used, then
that's okay. If it's for stuff that's dead or broken, it's not good.
- --
David Kowis
ISO Team Lead - www.sourcemage.org
Source Mage GNU/Linux
Progress isn't made by early risers. It's made by lazy men trying to
find easier ways to do something.
- Robert Heinlein
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32)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=8/IE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-
[SM-Discuss] Grimoire for deprecated spells,
Juuso Alasuutari, 08/14/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Grimoire for deprecated spells,
Flavien Bridault, 08/14/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Grimoire for deprecated spells,
Bearcat M. Sandor, 08/14/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Grimoire for deprecated spells,
Andraž "ruskie" Levstik, 08/14/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Grimoire for deprecated spells,
Juuso Alasuutari, 08/14/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Grimoire for deprecated spells, Arwed von Merkatz, 08/14/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Grimoire for deprecated spells,
David Kowis, 08/14/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Grimoire for deprecated spells,
Matthew Clark, 08/14/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Grimoire for deprecated spells, Matt Donovan, 08/14/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Grimoire for deprecated spells, Bearcat M. Sandor, 08/14/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Grimoire for deprecated spells,
Arwed von Merkatz, 08/15/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Grimoire for deprecated spells, Juuso Alasuutari, 08/15/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Grimoire for deprecated spells, Arwed von Merkatz, 08/15/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Grimoire for deprecated spells, Jeremy A. Kolb, 08/15/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Grimoire for deprecated spells, Juuso Alasuutari, 08/15/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Grimoire for deprecated spells, seth, 08/15/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Grimoire for deprecated spells,
Matthew Clark, 08/14/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Grimoire for deprecated spells,
Juuso Alasuutari, 08/14/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Grimoire for deprecated spells,
Andraž "ruskie" Levstik, 08/14/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Grimoire for deprecated spells,
Bearcat M. Sandor, 08/14/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Grimoire for deprecated spells,
Flavien Bridault, 08/14/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.