Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sm-discuss - Re: [SM-Discuss] Grimoire for deprecated spells

sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "Jeremy A. Kolb" <jkolb AT brandeis.edu>
  • To: Arwed von Merkatz <v.merkatz AT gmx.net>
  • Cc: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Grimoire for deprecated spells
  • Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 15:29:53 -0400 (EDT)

On Tue, 15 Aug 2006, Arwed von Merkatz wrote:

> On Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at 09:59:19PM +0300, Juuso Alasuutari wrote:
> > On Tuesday 15 August 2006 20:09, Arwed von Merkatz wrote:
> > > The point of having a grimoire for old stuff is that not all spells that
> > > get removed are dead projects. If a project is simply gone completely
> > > from the net, without any source location left, there's of course no
> > > point in keeping the spell. But consider stuff like gstreamer 0.6, that
> > > probably still builds just fine, but I definitely would never waste time
> > > on maintaining it. Same goes for gtk1 versions of stuff, e.g. abiword.
> >
> > I've had something like that in mind, too. Would this in your opinion
> > also
> > apply to spells like xfree86? It's maintained and a new version (4.6.0)
> > was
> > even released in May, but it seems that everything revolves around X.org
> > nowadays for our developers and users alike.
>
> In cases like this I'd say it depends on how much work it is to continue
> maintaining it. E.g. when xorg is completely switched to modular,
> maintaining both modular xorg and monolithic xfree as dependency trees
> may become too cumbersome to do, so xfree could get moved to deprecated
> eventually.
>
>
Speaking of which... when ARE we going to move to xorg-modular? I've been
running it for a few months out of the xorg-modular grimoire and it's been
great.

Jeremy





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page