sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Ladislav Hagara <ladislav.hagara AT unob.cz>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] git feedback
- Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2006 23:44:03 +0200
but more some general feeling like "if we have
to use git, I'll leave smgl development"
If majority of smgl developers want git I have no problems with it.
I like perforce and I think it is more suitable for us.
I really do not think that stability, scalability, and supportability of git is arguably better than p4.
Our Git Guide certainly need to be updated.
I am trying to "integrate" some security fixes from test to stable-rc and stable several days already (when I have time and I remember it) and still I have only problems and always end my suffering by "git reset --hard". I am really missing someting like "p4 integrate devel/xyz/... test/xyz/...", "p4 client", .... Yea, it can be only my problem. Of course we need more readable mails from sm-commit. I do not like git commit identifications, ...
As I wrote git can not force me to leave smgl. On the other way seems some developers have never used git.
We should probably vote on this. And as usually I prefer open voting.
--
Ladislav Hagara
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] git feedback
, (continued)
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] git feedback,
John Harding, 07/22/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] git feedback,
John Harding, 07/22/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] git feedback, Jeremy Blosser, 07/22/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] git feedback,
John Harding, 07/22/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] git feedback, David Brown, 07/22/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] git feedback, Jaka Kranjc, 07/22/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] git feedback, Andraž "ruskie" Levstik, 07/22/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] git feedback, Matthew Clark, 07/22/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] git feedback, seth, 07/22/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] git feedback, Robin Cook, 07/22/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] git feedback, Jeremy Blosser, 07/22/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] git feedback,
Ladislav Hagara, 07/22/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] git feedback,
Jeremy Blosser, 07/22/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] git feedback, Jeremy Blosser, 07/22/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] git feedback,
Jeremy Blosser, 07/27/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] git feedback,
Andraž "ruskie" Levstik, 07/28/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] git feedback, Jeremy Blosser, 07/28/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] git feedback, seth, 07/28/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] git feedback,
seth, 07/28/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] git feedback,
Arwed von Merkatz, 07/28/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] git feedback, Andraž "ruskie" Levstik, 07/28/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] git feedback,
Arwed von Merkatz, 07/28/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] git feedback, Ladislav Hagara, 07/28/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] git feedback,
Andraž "ruskie" Levstik, 07/28/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] git feedback,
Jeremy Blosser, 07/22/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] git feedback,
John Harding, 07/22/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.