sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: David Kowis <dkowis AT shlrm.org>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Patches in grimoires
- Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 07:32:00 -0500
Arwed von Merkatz wrote:
> On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 11:03:09AM +0200, Flavien Bridault wrote:
>> Le lundi 15 mai 2006 à 23:08 -0500, David Kowis a écrit :
>>> Jeremy Blosser wrote:
>>>> On May 15, Daniel Goller [dgoller AT satx.rr.com] wrote:
>>> Automation would be neat, but we'd have to have an application file or
>>> something. Like a file that specifies the order in which patches get
>>> applied.
>>>
>>> It's getting somewhat complicated, but it could be done, and with a well
>>> thought out API, optional patches could be programmed in. (Like a
>>> PATCHES file that uses the patches in the patches dir or somethin)
>>>
>>> apply_patch name.patch
>>> apply_patch othername.patch
>>> optional_patch "what the feck does it do?" y ricer.patch
>>>
>>> or something like that ;)
>>>
>> Why don't we use a mixed approach ? Most of the time sequence numbers
>> for the patch will be ok. Lot of spells use only one patch, some of them
>> two or three which can be applied in any order, and very few cause real
>> problems afaik. In my limited scope (disk, graphics and graphics-libs),
>> I only know the grub spell as a trouble maker.
>> This is a waste of time (and space) imho to add an application file each
>> time. But for the very few annoying spells such as grub, mutt and
>> others, we could have a PATCHES file as David proposed that will
>> override the "default_patch" function.
>> And that would be compliant with the sorcery way of thinking, as we used
>> to do that for other stages, right ?
>
> Please, not yet another file. We have a file for this purpose, it's
> called PRE_BUILD. Any automatic patching could be done in
> default_pre_build.
>
Sure :) We could have api pieces like apply_patch or optional_patch or
something in the PRE_BUILD. I was just brainstorming.
--
David Kowis
ISO Team Lead - www.sourcemage.org
Source Mage GNU/Linux
Progress isn't made by early risers. It's made by lazy men trying to
find easier ways to do something.
- Robert Heinlein
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Patches in grimoires
, (continued)
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Patches in grimoires, Andraž "ruskie" Levstik, 05/15/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Patches in grimoires,
Jeremy Blosser, 05/15/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Patches in grimoires,
Flavien Bridault, 05/15/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Patches in grimoires, Jeremy Blosser, 05/15/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Patches in grimoires,
Flavien Bridault, 05/15/2006
-
Message not available
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Patches in grimoires,
Daniel Goller, 05/15/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Patches in grimoires,
Jeremy Blosser, 05/15/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Patches in grimoires,
David Kowis, 05/16/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Patches in grimoires,
Flavien Bridault, 05/16/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Patches in grimoires, Arwed von Merkatz, 05/16/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Patches in grimoires, Flavien Bridault, 05/16/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Patches in grimoires, David Kowis, 05/16/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Patches in grimoires,
Flavien Bridault, 05/16/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Patches in grimoires,
David Kowis, 05/16/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Patches in grimoires,
Jeremy Blosser, 05/15/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Patches in grimoires,
Daniel Goller, 05/15/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Patches in grimoires, Andraž "ruskie" Levstik, 05/15/2006
-
Message not available
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Patches in grimoires,
Daniel Goller, 05/15/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Patches in grimoires,
Jeremy Blosser, 05/15/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Patches in grimoires, Daniel Goller, 05/15/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Patches in grimoires,
Jeremy Blosser, 05/15/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Patches in grimoires,
Daniel Goller, 05/15/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Patches in grimoires, Jaka Kranjc, 05/15/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.