Public SourceMage Discussion List

[Eric Sandall <eric AT sandall.us>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Andrew wrote:
> On Sat, May 06, 2006 at 12:42:03PM +0200, Flavien Bridault wrote:
> <snip>
>> Just a small question (maybe silly :-/ ), I agree that we need
>> gatekeepers to grant the integration in stable-rc; but do you really
>> need them to perform the integration ?
> <snip>
>>>>> - once the request is approved (flag set to "+"), it can be integrated
>>>>>   to the branch for which it was approved, currently that integration
>>>>>   can be done by anyone with access to those grimoires
> <snip>
> 
> I want to make a minor clarification, the integration can be done by
> anyone with access to stable (see above). There isnt a requirement
> (afaik) that someone with access to stable also be a gatekeeper. Or
> vice versa.

Correct. AFAIK anyone with access to stable-rc or stable can integrate
after one of the gatekeepers (who may or may not have similar access)
approves it. The main point is that the person who requests the
integration and the person who approves it /cannot/ be the same person.
Integration, AFAIK, can be done by anyone with access after it is
approved by a gatekeeper (including the gatekeeper).

- -sandalle

- --
Eric Sandall                     |  Source Mage GNU/Linux Developer
eric AT sandall.us                  |  http://www.sourcemage.org/
http://eric.sandall.us/          |  SysAdmin @ Shock Physics @ WSU
http://counter.li.org/  #196285  |  http://www.shock.wsu.edu/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFEXSh1HXt9dKjv3WERAiNzAKCRYXTuwVhJ8Dov/6Z3x2D8yQGNLgCgqJUF
TwxQ2cLPEsWMc8fRNecfRv0=
=Z+Y3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----