sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
Re: [SM-Discuss] voting process (was: Team Lead Nominations: Project Lead)
- From: "Jeremy Blosser (emrys)" <jblosser-smgl AT firinn.org>
- To: SM Discuss <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] voting process (was: Team Lead Nominations: Project Lead)
- Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 00:27:43 -0600
On Feb 14, Mathieu L. [lejatorn AT smgl.homelinux.net] wrote:
> Hmm, so how do we proceed by now? Shall we just send nominations to
> dkowis privately?
Send them to the list so that they can be seconded (or not).
I guess technically if you don't want to do it publically there's nothing
in the policy that says you can't send them privately, but they'd need to
get announced to the list somehow so they could be seconded.
> On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 04:20:04PM -0800, Eric Sandall wrote:
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > On Thu, 9 Feb 2006, Jeremy Blosser (emrys) wrote:
> > > On Feb 08, Eric Sandall [eric AT sandall.us] wrote:
> > >> While this is a month late, I figure better late than never. ;) Up for
> > >> nominations is the position of Project Lead. Please follow our Team
> > <snip>
> > > Note that while this prevents the vote counter from stealing an
> > > election,
> > > it still leaves them with knowledge of all the votes. This means even
> > > if
> > > we decided to switch to something like this in time for the PL vote,
> > > Eric
> > > still shouldn't be the vote counter. dkowis has volunteered to count
> > > this
> > > election, assuming he doesn't get nominated himself. If anyone has a
> > > particular problem with that option, please let Eric or me know.
> > >
> > > If we do both (publish the votes and have dkowis process them), the vote
> > > can be verified, and only he would know who all voted for whom.
> >
> > If that wasn't clear, David Kowis (dkowis AT sourcemage.org) will be
> > collecting both the nominations and the votes so that there's no
> > conflict of interest. ;) Currently we're only accepting nominations.
> >
> > - -sandalle
Attachment:
pgpcnQw6sCYLn.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] voting process
, (continued)
- Re: [SM-Discuss] voting process, David Kowis, 02/11/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] voting process, Eric Sandall, 02/13/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] voting process, Sergey A. Lipnevich, 02/13/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] voting process, Mathieu L., 02/12/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] voting process, Jeremy Blosser (emrys), 02/11/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] voting process, Sergey A. Lipnevich, 02/11/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] voting process, Andrew, 02/10/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] voting process (was: Team Lead Nominations: Project Lead),
Mathieu L., 02/14/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] voting process (was: Team Lead Nominations: Project Lead),
Jeremy Blosser (emrys), 02/14/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] voting process (was: Team Lead Nominations: Project Lead), Eric Sandall, 02/14/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] voting process (was: Team Lead Nominations: Project Lead),
Jeremy Blosser (emrys), 02/14/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Team Lead Nominations: Project Lead, Eric Sandall, 02/13/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Team Lead Nominations: Project Lead, Jeremy Blosser (emrys), 02/13/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.