sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL as GNU-certified Free(R)(TM) Distro?
- From: George Sherwood <pilot AT beernabeer.com>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL as GNU-certified Free(R)(TM) Distro?
- Date: Sat, 05 Nov 2005 08:17:18 -0500
On Sat, 2005-11-05 at 12:43 +0100, Flavien Bridault wrote:
> But if I understood the discussion far from
> here, they should not be removed ? I have several questions about that,
> I think the answers might have been in this thread, but it becomes so
> long that it is quite hard to find them ;-)
> If we try to be qualified as GNU-certified free distro :
I will answer as I have read the thread. Not necessarily what swooley
has intended.
>
> 1) Could non-free softwares still be installed by spells in our
> z-rejected grimoire, which will be moved somewhere ?
Yes, you could scribe add <from a different URL>
> 2) Could the maintainer(s) of z-rejected still belong to the SMGL Team ?
No, at least not in an acknowledged way.
> 3) Could we track bugs about z-rejected grimoire in our main bugzilla ?
No.
> 4) If yes, shall we then sort the bugs, so that we refuse to correct
> bugs that are not related to packaging ?
Not applicable, can't be in bugzilla.
> 5) Will the providers be added with z-rejected ? For instance, will I
> have JAVA or not ?
No.
George
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL as GNU-certified Free(R)(TM) Distro?
, (continued)
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL as GNU-certified Free(R)(TM) Distro?,
Seth Alan Woolley, 11/04/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL as GNU-certified Free(R)(TM) Distro?,
Jeremy Blosser (emrys), 11/04/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL as GNU-certified Free(R)(TM) Distro?,
Seth Alan Woolley, 11/04/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL as GNU-certified Free(R)(TM) Distro?, Jeremy Blosser (emrys), 11/04/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL as GNU-certified Free(R)(TM) Distro?, Seth Alan Woolley, 11/04/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL as GNU-certified Free(R)(TM) Distro?, Jeremy Blosser (emrys), 11/05/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL as GNU-certified Free(R)(TM) Distro?, Seth Alan Woolley, 11/05/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL as GNU-certified Free(R)(TM) Distro?, George Sherwood, 11/05/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL as GNU-certified Free(R)(TM) Distro?, Mathieu L., 11/05/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL as GNU-certified Free(R)(TM) Distro?, Flavien Bridault, 11/05/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL as GNU-certified Free(R)(TM) Distro?, George Sherwood, 11/05/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL as GNU-certified Free(R)(TM) Distro?, Andrew "ruskie" Levstik, 11/05/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL as GNU-certified Free(R)(TM) Distro?, Andrew, 11/05/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL as GNU-certified Free(R)(TM) Distro?, Eric Sandall, 11/05/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL as GNU-certified Free(R)(TM) Distro?, Sergey A. Lipnevich, 11/06/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL as GNU-certified Free(R)(TM) Distro?, Arwed von Merkatz, 11/06/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL as GNU-certified Free(R)(TM) Distro?, Andrew "ruskie" Levstik, 11/06/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL as GNU-certified Free(R)(TM) Distro?, Sergey A. Lipnevich, 11/06/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL as GNU-certified Free(R)(TM) Distro?, Arwed von Merkatz, 11/06/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL as GNU-certified Free(R)(TM) Distro?, Andrew "ruskie" Levstik, 11/06/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL as GNU-certified Free(R)(TM) Distro?,
Seth Alan Woolley, 11/04/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL as GNU-certified Free(R)(TM) Distro?,
Jeremy Blosser (emrys), 11/04/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL as GNU-certified Free(R)(TM) Distro?,
Seth Alan Woolley, 11/04/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL as GNU-certified Free(R)(TM) Distro?, Eric Sandall, 11/05/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.