sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL as GNU-certified Free(R)(TM) Distro?
- From: Arwed von Merkatz <v.merkatz AT gmx.net>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL as GNU-certified Free(R)(TM) Distro?
- Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2005 20:27:22 +0100
On Sun, Nov 06, 2005 at 02:19:30PM -0500, Sergey A. Lipnevich wrote:
> Speaking of which, Ubuntu packages Eclipse compiled with GCJ and using
> free class library. This is very brittle stuff, but it can be done.
It can be done, same for lots of java packages. Fedora/RedHat has been
doing that for a long time. The problem is that for most of these the
build system doesn't support it out of the box, so you have to
essentially write your own build system (e.g. ant doesn't allow
bootstrapping with gcj, but Fedora ships with a gcj built ant).
> Eric Sandall wrote:
>
> >Also, now a package that may be 'free' (e.g. eclipse) would have to go
> >in z-rejected, or you could have a broken package (eclipse would
> >install, but not run).
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> SM-Discuss mailing list
> SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss
>
--
Arwed v. Merkatz Source Mage GNU/Linux developer
http://www.sourcemage.org
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL as GNU-certified Free(R)(TM) Distro?
, (continued)
- Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL as GNU-certified Free(R)(TM) Distro?, Jeremy Blosser (emrys), 11/05/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL as GNU-certified Free(R)(TM) Distro?, Seth Alan Woolley, 11/05/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL as GNU-certified Free(R)(TM) Distro?, George Sherwood, 11/05/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL as GNU-certified Free(R)(TM) Distro?, Mathieu L., 11/05/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL as GNU-certified Free(R)(TM) Distro?, Flavien Bridault, 11/05/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL as GNU-certified Free(R)(TM) Distro?, George Sherwood, 11/05/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL as GNU-certified Free(R)(TM) Distro?, Andrew "ruskie" Levstik, 11/05/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL as GNU-certified Free(R)(TM) Distro?, Andrew, 11/05/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL as GNU-certified Free(R)(TM) Distro?, Eric Sandall, 11/05/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL as GNU-certified Free(R)(TM) Distro?, Sergey A. Lipnevich, 11/06/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL as GNU-certified Free(R)(TM) Distro?, Arwed von Merkatz, 11/06/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL as GNU-certified Free(R)(TM) Distro?, Andrew "ruskie" Levstik, 11/06/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL as GNU-certified Free(R)(TM) Distro?, Sergey A. Lipnevich, 11/06/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL as GNU-certified Free(R)(TM) Distro?, Arwed von Merkatz, 11/06/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL as GNU-certified Free(R)(TM) Distro?, Andrew "ruskie" Levstik, 11/06/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL as GNU-certified Free(R)(TM) Distro?, Eric Sandall, 11/05/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL as GNU-certified Free(R)(TM) Distro?, David Kowis, 11/05/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL as GNU-certified Free(R)(TM) Distro?, Andrew, 11/05/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL as GNU-certified Free(R)(TM) Distro?, Seth Alan Woolley, 11/04/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.