sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL as GNU-certified Free(R)(TM) Distro?
- From: "Sergey A. Lipnevich" <sergey AT sourcemage.org>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL as GNU-certified Free(R)(TM) Distro?
- Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2005 15:16:27 -0500
I am not arguing with this statement. What you said originally was different, more narrow in scope. You said that what we do, merging development grimoire into test all the time, and test into stable, and sometimes back, is not going to work well with Subversion. And this is what I'd like to model, not all possible branch workflows.
Sergey.
Arwed von Merkatz wrote:
Well, I'm using subversion for some of my own projects, and so far the
best I can say is that subversion branches suck. They are dead easy to
create, but almost impossible to use except for one-shot branches or
straight branch-develop-merge workflow. They just don't work for
repeated merges back and forth between branches.
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL as GNU-certified Free(R)(TM) Distro?
, (continued)
- Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL as GNU-certified Free(R)(TM) Distro?, Sergey A. Lipnevich, 11/03/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL as GNU-certified Free(R)(TM) Distro?,
Maurizio Boriani, 11/04/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL as GNU-certified Free(R)(TM) Distro?, Andrew, 11/04/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL as GNU-certified Free(R)(TM) Distro?,
Karsten Behrmann, 11/03/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL as GNU-certified Free(R)(TM) Distro?,
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 11/03/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL as GNU-certified Free(R)(TM) Distro?,
Arwed von Merkatz, 11/03/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL as GNU-certified Free(R)(TM) Distro?,
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 11/03/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL as GNU-certified Free(R)(TM) Distro?,
Arwed von Merkatz, 11/03/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL as GNU-certified Free(R)(TM) Distro?,
Andrew "ruskie" Levstik, 11/03/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL as GNU-certified Free(R)(TM) Distro?, Eric Sandall, 11/03/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL as GNU-certified Free(R)(TM) Distro?, Sergey A. Lipnevich, 11/03/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL as GNU-certified Free(R)(TM) Distro?,
Andrew "ruskie" Levstik, 11/03/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL as GNU-certified Free(R)(TM) Distro?,
Arwed von Merkatz, 11/03/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL as GNU-certified Free(R)(TM) Distro?,
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 11/03/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL as GNU-certified Free(R)(TM) Distro?,
Arwed von Merkatz, 11/03/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL as GNU-certified Free(R)(TM) Distro?,
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 11/03/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL as GNU-certified Free(R)(TM) Distro?,
Robert Figura, 11/03/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL as GNU-certified Free(R)(TM) Distro?, Seth Alan Woolley, 11/04/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL as GNU-certified Free(R)(TM) Distro?,
Paul Mahon, 11/03/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL as GNU-certified Free(R)(TM) Distro?,
Seth Alan Woolley, 11/04/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL as GNU-certified Free(R)(TM) Distro?,
Pieter Lenaerts, 11/04/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL as GNU-certified Free(R)(TM) Distro?,
Seth Alan Woolley, 11/04/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL as GNU-certified Free(R)(TM) Distro?,
Jeremy Blosser (emrys), 11/04/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL as GNU-certified Free(R)(TM) Distro?,
Seth Alan Woolley, 11/04/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL as GNU-certified Free(R)(TM) Distro?, Jeremy Blosser (emrys), 11/04/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL as GNU-certified Free(R)(TM) Distro?, Seth Alan Woolley, 11/04/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL as GNU-certified Free(R)(TM) Distro?,
Seth Alan Woolley, 11/04/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL as GNU-certified Free(R)(TM) Distro?,
Jeremy Blosser (emrys), 11/04/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL as GNU-certified Free(R)(TM) Distro?,
Seth Alan Woolley, 11/04/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL as GNU-certified Free(R)(TM) Distro?,
Pieter Lenaerts, 11/04/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL as GNU-certified Free(R)(TM) Distro?,
Seth Alan Woolley, 11/04/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.