sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Andrew <afrayedknot AT thefrayedknot.armory.com>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] linux-new call
- Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 00:03:39 -0700
> > >
> > > >The second thing is that once the module is recompilled, it dispells
> > > >old
> > > >version, which makes old kernel un-usable. If I am going to reboot to
> > > >older kernel, I have to recast theese modules again. I would like to
> > > >have the modules stay on the system for each kernel I compiled them.
> > >
> > > A solution would be to have sorcery ignore dispel in /lib/modules
> > Those spells need to simply add a protected file.
>
> Maybe I'm blind, but this is allready working feature ? I haven't found
> anything near 'protected' or 'filter' in libapi.
>
I mentioned it in the 1.12.0 sorcery release notes, and several emails
leading up to it. There were bugs and a wiki page and all the usual
stuff. I recall some other conversations on it, i guess none of that
was widely read. I guess I didnt do enough advertising...*sigh*
-Andrew
--
__________________________________________________________________________
|Andrew D. Stitt | astitt at sourcemage.org |
|irc: afrayedknot | afrayedknot at t.armory.com |
|aim: thefrayedknot or iteratorplusplus | acedit at armory.com |
|Sorcery Team Lead | ftp://t.armory.com/ |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment:
pgpdfY9ycoiCT.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-
[SM-Discuss] linux-new call,
Eric Sandall, 05/30/2005
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
-
RE: [SM-Discuss] linux-new call,
David Michael Leo Brown Jr., 05/30/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] linux-new call, Duane Malcolm, 05/30/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] linux-new call, neuron, 05/30/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] linux-new call,
David Michael Leo Brown Jr., 05/30/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] linux-new call, Sergey A. Lipnevich, 05/30/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] linux-new call,
David Michael Leo Brown Jr., 05/30/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] linux-new call,
Andrew, 05/30/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] linux-new call,
neuron, 05/31/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] linux-new call,
Andrew, 05/31/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] linux-new call, neuron, 05/31/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] linux-new call,
Andrew, 05/31/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] linux-new call,
neuron, 05/31/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] linux-new call, neuron, 05/31/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] linux-new call,
Andrew, 05/30/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] linux-new call,
David Michael Leo Brown Jr., 05/30/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] linux-new call,
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 05/30/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] linux-new call, neuron, 05/31/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] linux-new call,
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 05/30/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] linux-new call,
David Michael Leo Brown Jr., 05/31/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] linux-new call, Seth Alan Woolley, 05/31/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] linux-new call, Sergey A. Lipnevich, 05/31/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] linux-new call, David Michael Leo Brown Jr., 05/31/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] linux-new call, David Michael Leo Brown Jr., 05/31/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.