sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: neuron <vlmarek AT volny.cz>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] linux-new call
- Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 07:42:17 +0200
> I think not. But if you leave it like this it woudn't be called
> "functionality" at all because it wouldn't work :-). Is there a way for
> a kernel build to "refresh" configuration without going into interactive
> menu? Something like "config" without "menu?"
make oldconfig, perhaps ?
--
neuron
> On Mon, 2005-05-30 at 22:57 -0400, David Michael Leo Brown Jr. wrote:
> > >Hey David,
> > >
> > >I glanced through Wiki page and have a question. If the kernel version
> > >changes, new parameters are added sometimes, so the kernel doesn't build
> > >without going into menuconfig. In the Wiki, you say that the only way to
> > >go into menuconfig is to do "cast -r", but "sorcery system-update"
> > >doesn't do that, so the new version of the kernel will not cast during
> > >system update in at least 50% of cases. The current situation is no
> > >better, but maybe there's a solution to this problem that the linux-new
> > >spell can achieve?
>
>
> > Well there's only one thing I can do to fix this and that's not make it
> > update the version with a sorcery system-update.
> >
> > Which can be done pretty easy.
> >
> > The question would be 'Would this be desireable functionality?'
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> SM-Discuss mailing list
> SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss
>
Attachment:
pgpum0JiTeRAD.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] linux-new call
, (continued)
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] linux-new call,
David Michael Leo Brown Jr., 05/30/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] linux-new call, Sergey A. Lipnevich, 05/30/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] linux-new call,
David Michael Leo Brown Jr., 05/30/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] linux-new call,
Andrew, 05/30/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] linux-new call,
neuron, 05/31/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] linux-new call,
Andrew, 05/31/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] linux-new call, neuron, 05/31/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] linux-new call,
Andrew, 05/31/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] linux-new call,
neuron, 05/31/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] linux-new call, neuron, 05/31/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] linux-new call,
Andrew, 05/30/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] linux-new call,
David Michael Leo Brown Jr., 05/30/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] linux-new call,
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 05/30/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] linux-new call, neuron, 05/31/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] linux-new call,
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 05/30/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] linux-new call,
David Michael Leo Brown Jr., 05/31/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] linux-new call, Seth Alan Woolley, 05/31/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] linux-new call, Sergey A. Lipnevich, 05/31/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] linux-new call, David Michael Leo Brown Jr., 05/31/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] linux-new call,
David Michael Leo Brown Jr., 05/31/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] linux-new call,
Seth Alan Woolley, 05/31/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] linux-new call, Sergey A. Lipnevich, 05/31/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] linux-new call,
Ladislav Hagara, 05/31/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] linux-new call, Eric Sandall, 05/31/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] linux-new call, Sergey A. Lipnevich, 05/31/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] linux-new call,
Seth Alan Woolley, 05/31/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] linux-new call,
David Michael Leo Brown Jr., 05/30/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.